Category Archives: Letters and Emails-Elected Officials

Email from Walter Jones re. Communications Blackout

Below is an email I sent to Congressman Walter Jones, and Senators Richard Burr and Kay Hagan. Following my email is the response from Congressman Jones.

Email –

I have been hearing for weeks in blogs that someone in the government will be testing a communication blackout that will shut down all cable, internet, phones, cell phones, television, and radio on November 9, 2-11; however, I have not heard anything about the blackout on the national or cable news. Today, however, I saw an ad by the Federal Communications Commission on Time Warner cable announcing the blackout to take place on November 9th. What is unclear is why such a blackout is needed and whether it will impact emergency services like 911, police, and fire, and for what purpose the government might need to blackout all communications. I would appreciate if you would provide me with what you know about this FCC action, especially under what conditions the Federal Government thinks that shutting down all communications may be necessary. I would also like to know whether Congress has been consulted and approved of this action and the basis of any Congressional approval if any.

Response –

Dear Mr. Lang:

 

Thank you for contacting me to share your concerns regarding today’s nationwide test of the Emergency Alert System (EAS).  I appreciate you taking the time to contact me and I’m honored to respond.

 

            Today at 2:00 p.m. EST a nationwide test of the EAS was conducted by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).  The purpose of the event was to test the ability to alert the public to important emergency information.  The government’s ability to conduct this test and all other EAS tests is authorized by the Communications Act of 1934.  Participants must be notified of the test at least two months in advance.

 

Again, thanks for sharing your thoughts and concerns with me.  If I may be of any further assistance please feel free to contact my office.

Congressman Jones on Obama's Jobs Act

Dear Mr. Lang:

 

Thank you for your recent letter regarding President Barack Obama’s proposed “JOBS Act”.  I appreciate you taking the time to contact me and I’m grateful for the opportunity to respond.

 

I can assure you that I share the President’s stated desire to reduce unemployment in America.  It is absolutely essential that Congress reform the regulatory, legal, tax, and fiscal environment in this country so that employers in America can grow their businesses and put unemployed Americans back to work.  I am committed to that cause, and vote accordingly on the House floor.  However, I disagree with the President’s notion that more government programs are the answer to restoring employment.  In my opinion, the record shows that more government intervention in the economy will impede, not stimulate, job creation.

 

Nevertheless, there are some elements of the President’s proposal that have merit.  Leaders in the House of Representatives have indicated their support for many of these proposals and I look forward to their consideration on the House floor.

 

Thanks again for taking the time to reach out to me.  If you have further questions about other federal matters, please don’t hesitate to contact me.

 
Sincerely,

Walter B. Jones
Member of Congress

Email from Senator Hagan re. Solyndra

September 30, 2011

Dear Friend,

Thank you for contacting me regarding Solyndra.  I greatly appreciate hearing your thoughts on this important issue.

Solyndra was a solar panel manufacturer founded in 2005.  In September 2011, two years after receiving a $535 million loan guarantee from the Department of Energy, the company filed for bankruptcy.  The Treasury Department is currently investigating the loan guarantee approved for the Solyndra project, as is the Department of Energy’s inspector general.

Like you, I believe we must carefully monitor how taxpayer dollars are spent.  This is particularly important at a time when the annual federal budget deficit exceeds $1 trillion.  While I share your concerns about the loan guarantee awarded to Solyndra, I do not believe this incident is necessarily indicative of the entire Loan Guarantee Program, which has helped many important energy projects move forward in these difficult economic times.  Projects that have benefited from the Loan Guarantee Program include nuclear power plants, biofuels, and smart grid technologies.

As this matter is further investigated, I will be sure to keep your thoughts and concerns in mind.

Again, thank you for contacting my office. It is truly an honor to represent North Carolina in the United States Senate, and I hope you will not hesitate to contact me in the future should you have any further questions or concerns.

Sincerely,

Signature

Kay R. Hagan

Email from Senator Hagan on Obama Jobs Bill

September 27, 2011

Dear Friend,

Thank you for contacting me regarding the American Jobs Act.  I greatly appreciate your thoughts on this important issue.

Proposed by President Obama in his address to a Joint Session of Congress on September 8th, the American Jobs Act (S. 1549) was introduced into the Senate on September 13th.  The American Jobs Act is a multi-tiered approach to creating jobs and revitalizing the American economy.  The legislation expands payroll tax cuts to small businesses by cutting the payroll tax rate in half on the first $5 million in wages paid by companies.  The bill establishes a national infrastructure bank to co-invest with the private sector in a broad range of national and regional road, bridge and other priority physical infrastructure needs.  Other provisions include reforms to unemployment insurance and help for small businesses in gaining access to capital.

Job creation, particularly in North Carolina, remains my number one priority. That’s why I introduced the Hire A Hero Act in February to give small businesses a tax credit for hiring our returning veterans.  I am pleased the President included a similar proposal in his jobs plan.  I have also re-introduced the AMERICA Works Act.  This measure matches employees with employers nationwide by giving priority consideration to training programs offering portable, national, industry-recognized credentials for American workers wherever they live.  The AMERICA Works Act builds on the success of the Manufacturing Skills Certification System, helps Americans get back to work, and sets our country on the right path to be more competitive in the global economy.

There is more work to be done, and I believe that the President’s proposal contains a number of worthwhile initiatives.  My bottom line:  I will continue to work with anyone in Washington – Democrat, Republican or Independent –  to achieve practical, bipartisan solutions to help jumpstart the stalled American economy and create jobs.

Again, thank you for contacting my office. It is truly an honor to represent North Carolina in the United States Senate, and I hope you will not hesitate to contact me in the future should you have any further questions or concerns.

Sincerely,

Signature

Kay R. Hagan

Email from Senator Kay Hagan, Sept 26, 2011

Folks,

 

Senator Kay Hagan is against a Balanced Budget Amendment.  Might of fact, the Senator’s own viewpoint on how government would balance the budget is “to take in at least as much revenue each year as it spends”.  That is right folks!  Senator Hagan believes the only way to balance the budget is to increase revenues to match spending instead of just simply decrease spending.  The only way government can increase revenues is through increasing taxes or fees.  That is our far left liberal Senator in action!

 

Please post Senator Hagan’s response to our website.

 

Eric

 

 

From: senator_reply@hagan.senate.gov [mailto:senator_reply@hagan.senate.gov]
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2011 9:48 AM
To: ebroyles@ec.rr.com
Subject: Balanced Budget Amendment

 

Letterhead

     September 26, 2011

Dear Friend,

Thank you for contacting me to express your support for a balanced budget amendment to our Constitution. I appreciate your thoughts on this very important issue. I sincerely apologize for my delayed response.

There’s no doubt that Washington needs to get its fiscal house in order. You may be pleased to learn that the recently passed, bipartisan Budget Control Act of 2011 (S. 365) will reduce our budget deficits over the next ten years by at least $2.1 trillion. It meets that goal by immediately cutting spending by $917 billion over ten years, and establishes a new bipartisan Joint Select Committee charged with producing another $1.5 trillion in deficit reduction. To hold the new committee and Congress accountable for coming to a balanced agreement, automatic budget cuts will take effect in October 2012 if an agreement is not reached.

You may also be pleased to learn the Budget Control Act requires Congress to vote on a balanced budget amendment this fall. As you know, a balanced budget amendment would require the government to take in at least as much revenue each year as it spends. I take my oath to defend and protect the Constitution very seriously, and I closely scrutinize any proposed changes to our founding document. While I continue to believe that our budget deficits and debt are among the most critical national problems we now face,  I have concerns that amending the Constitution to fix it would restrict our ability to meet the needs of seniors and veterans as well as limit our ability to react to national emergencies. Getting our fiscal house in order shouldn’t require us to amend the Constitution. It just requires Congress to do its job.

Again, thank you for contacting my office. It is truly an honor to represent North Carolina in the United States Senate, and I hope you will not hesitate to contact me in the future should you have any further questions or concerns.

Sincerely,

Signature

Kay R. Hagan

Email from Rep. Walter Jones on Debt Ceiling, July 21, 2011

Dear Friend,

In the wake of the ongoing debate on the Federal Debt Ceiling many people have been contacting my offices asking for a good source of unbiased, current information on the subject. Frankly, our country is faced with making a selection between a number of unpleasant options, so having information upon which to judge those options is more important than ever.

 

How much of our current budget is being funded by taxes, and how much by new borrowing? What happens if we do not raise the debt ceiling? What happens if the debt ceiling is raised without dealing with the underlying causes of the rising debt? What happens if we default on our debt?

 

The House Republican leadership recently invited Jerome Powell – former Undersecretary of Treasury in the George H.W. Bush Administration – to present members of Congress with a nonpartisan debt limit analysis, and to present a fact-based look at what consequences our country will be facing without a resolution to the current budget crisis.

 

I am linking to the report here, so that the people of Eastern North Carolina can fully understand the magnitude of the current situation. I urge you to read the report and share this information with your friends and loved ones.

 

Sincerely,

J

Walter B. Jones
Member of Congress (NC-03)

Letter from Rep. Walter Jones, July 21, 2011

Dear Mr. Broyles:

 

Thank you for your recent email regarding offshore oil and gas drilling.  I appreciate you taking the time to contact me and I’m grateful for the opportunity to respond.

 

I, like most Americans, support offshore drilling when done under the right circumstances.  As an advocate of the federalist principles of states’ rights upon which our nation was founded, I believe strongly that states ought to have the authority to determine whether oil and gas drilling takes place off their coast, not the federal government as is currently the case.  In fact, one of the first bills I introduced in Congress would have given states that responsibility.  It is the citizens of North Carolina, not North Dakota or any other state, who are in the best position to decide whether drilling off North Carolina makes sense for North Carolinians.  I also believe that if North Carolinians decide that drilling off our coast is something that should be pursued, North Carolina ought to get the lion’s share of the royalty revenue generated by that drilling, not the federal government as is now the case.  After all, it is North Carolina that would bear the risk and expense of environmental damage stemming from an oil spill, and the state should be compensated accordingly.

 

I also believe that the unprecedented Gulf oil spill showed the need for comprehensive reform of America’s drilling standards and oversight.  No one wants to see that kind of devastation again, particularly those who live on or enjoy North Carolina’s Outer Banks.  That being said, I share the frustration of those concerned that the pace of the Obama Administration’s reforms in this regard has been too slow.

 

With that as background, as you may be aware the House of Representatives recently considered three bills dealing with offshore drilling: H.R. 1229, H.R. 1230 and H.R. 231.  I voted against each of these bills and I’d like to explain why.

 

H.R. 1229 would create a new system for approval of oil companies’ applications for permits to drill for oil and gas offshore.  A key feature of the bill was a requirement that if a company’s application was not approved in 60 days, it was deemed automatically approved.  While we all acknowledge that the federal government should not be slow walking drilling permits, I believe it is wrong, particularly after the Gulf oil spill, to require automatic approval of applications even if there are serious questions about whether the drilling plan presented by the oil company can be carried out in a safe, environmentally responsible.

 

H.R. 1230 would require the Administration to offer three Gulf of Mexico lease sales that were temporarily suspended after the Gulf oil spill.  This is being proposed even though the Interior Department has already announced plans to offer all of these lease sales later this year or early next year.  The bill would also deem the pre-Gulf oil spill environmental impact statements on these leases automatically approved.  To me, that just doesn’t make sense.  At the very least, the oil companies ought to be required to update their environmental impact statements to make sure they account for and mitigate the potential environmental damage that can result from a blowout.  Updating these statements need not take an extended period of time, but I believe it needs to be done.

 

H.R. 1231 would open up the Atlantic Ocean to offshore oil and gas drilling, including North Carolina.  However, it would not direct any of the royalty revenue from that drilling to North Carolina; that money would instead go to the federal government.  As I mentioned previously, I oppose this sort of top-down approach because I believe this decision ought to be made by North Carolinians, and the bulk of the revenue ought to go to North Carolina.

 

As you know, the topic of drilling for oil is inextricably linked to the price of gas that we all pay at the pump.  I strongly agree that drilling for more oil here in America would certainly be good for economy, and would be helpful in reducing gas prices.  That’s why it’s so frustrating that many oil companies are not drilling the leases on public land that they already own.  For example, according to an Interior Department report released on March 29, 2011, the Interior Department found that of the 38 million acres of public lands under lease, over 21 million acres (57%) are not in production or exploration.  Furthermore, of the 34 million acres already under lease offshore in the Gulf of Mexico, almost 24 million acres (70%) are inactive (i.e. neither producing or subject to approved or pending exploration or development plans).  I think we can all agree that these oil companies need to start producing on these lands, and if they don’t, they ought to step aside and let other companies step up to the plate.

 

Lastly, I have been very vocal about the role that Federal Reserve’s unprecedented $2 trillion money printing campaign has had in raising the price of oil and nearly every other commodity.  I have also been outspoken on the need for federal regulators to do their jobs and enforce existing statutes to reign in the excessive speculation and manipulation of the oil markets.  If you have a moment, I would encourage you to review recent statements that I have given on these topics, which can be found here:

 

http://jones.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=242385

 

http://jones.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=228376

 

http://jones.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=220286

 

Thanks again for taking the time to contact me about this issue.  If you have further questions about other federal matters, please don’t hesitate to contact me.

 
Sincerely,

Walter B. Jones
Member of Congress

Letter from Sen. Hagan, July 21, 2011

July 21, 2011

Dear Friend [Eric B.],

Thank you for contacting me regarding federal spending and the national debt. I appreciate hearing your thoughts on this important issue.

Our mounting debt is our most pressing national priority, and Democrats and Republicans must work together to put our fiscal house in order. In the last 10 years, our national debt has nearly tripled. In fact, at our current pace, interest payments on our national debt could rise to nearly $1 trillion by 2020. These mandatory interest payments will limit funding for other national priorities, like new roads, schools, and research. With this in mind, I am working to reduce our deficit and confront our mounting debt.

During the 111th Congress, I voted to reinstate the budget principle known as “pay-as-you-go.” The principle requires legislation that would increase the deficit to be offset by measures that reduce the deficit by an equal amount. That amendment was agreed to by a vote of 60-39, and I believe it is a good start to control deficit spending. I have also supported numerous bipartisan efforts to establish a five-year cap on discretionary spending. Discretionary spending caps have a proven track record of controlling government spending and reducing the deficit.

To begin to confront our mounting debt head on, I fought for the creation of the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform, which President Obama created on February 18, 2010. This bipartisan commission, which was co-chaired by North Carolina’s own Erskine Bowles, produced recommendations to reduce the deficit by more than $4 trillion over the next 10 years. On December 1, 2010, the Commission published its final report, which you can read online at: http://www.fiscalcommission.gov/.

While I do not agree with everything in the report, the work of the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform is evidence that common ground is possible. We must reduce spending across the board and reform our tax code to eliminate loopholes and make it fairer and simpler for everyone. I believe everything needs to be on the table, and the solution must be balanced and bipartisan.

Fiscal responsibility requires smart investments, budgeting discipline, and shared sacrifice. As a state senator, I served as co-chair of the Budget Committee and worked across the aisle to balance North Carolina’s budget for five straight years. As we work to put our fiscal house in order, we cannot neglect our obligations to our seniors or place undue burdens on working families. As Congress continues to work to reduce the deficit, I pledge to keep your thoughts and concerns in mind.

Again, thank you for contacting my office. It is truly an honor to represent North Carolina in the United States Senate, and I hope you will not hesitate to contact me in the future should you have any further questions or concerns.

Sincerely,

Signature

Kay R. Hagan

Letter from Kay Hagan re. Foreign Aid

May 19, 2011

Dear Friend,

Thank you for contacting my office regarding foreign aid.  I appreciate hearing your thoughts on this issue.

The United States’ policy regarding foreign aid and assistance programs emphasizes their use as a means to achieve broader foreign policy objectives.  Generally, these objectives include strengthening of national security, development of a solid global economy and an affirmation of our leadership in the international community.  Humanitarian assistance is closely connected to these objectives and is an example of the United States’ compassion for those who suffer worldwide.

While I support responsible foreign aid programs, I recognize that in a time of tight budgets we will have to look closely at every dollar we spend.  It is important that foreign aid and humanitarian programs have clear goals and measurable outcomes. For this particular reason I cosponsored the Foreign Assistance Revitalization and Accountability Act (S.1524) in the 111th Congress. This legislation aims to streamline U.S. foreign aid. The ultimate goal of this legislation is to strengthen the capacity, transparency, and accountability of U.S. foreign assistance programs.

I will be sure to keep your thoughts and opinions in mind as this issue is considered in the United States Senate.

Again, thank you for contacting my office. It is truly an honor to represent North Carolina in the United States Senate, and I hope you will not hesitate to contact me in the future should you have any further questions or concerns.

Sincerely,

Signature

Kay R. Hagan

Letter fro Walter Jones on Foreigh Aid

Dear Mr. Broyles:

 

Thank you for contacting with your concerns of providing foreign aid to  North Korea .  I value hearing from you on this matter and appreciate the opportunity to respond.

 

I share your opposition to spending taxpayer dollars on aid to foreign countries.  That’s why I have not voted for a foreign aid spending bill in 15 years.  Our tax dollars should be spent right here at home, especially during trying economic times such as these.  As you may know, we have a $14 billion national debt and we’re now adding over $1.5 billion to that total every year, most of that in money borrowed from overseas.  It makes no sense to borrow money from countries like  China only to then transfer that money to other foreign countries.  Unless the Congress puts a stop to runaway spending on unnecessary items like foreign aid, I’m afraid this nation is staring into the abyss of bankruptcy.

 

Again, thank you for taking the time to write on this important issue.  If I may be of further assistance, please let me know.

 

 
Sincerely,

Walter B. Jones
Member of Congress

A Message from Senator Burr

I am honored to announce that I will be joining the Senate Finance Committee, and I thank Senator McConnell and the Republican Conference for allowing me the opportunity to serve on this important committee.
There is no aspect of our daily lives that is not touched by the laws and regulations that fall under the committee’s jurisdiction, from the tax code and our nation’s trade laws to health care and retirement security.  Regrettably, many of these laws and regulations have become so burdensome and complex that they are choking our nation’s economy, hampering job creation, and drowning our country in debt.  I look forward to working with my committee colleagues to address these critical challenges which I believe are among the most important of our time.
While taking the seat on Finance requires me to leave my seat on the Energy Committee, this new committee assignment will only serve to complement my current seat on the Health, Education, Labor & Pensions Committee, particularly on health care and retirement security issues.  I have long made these issues a priority, and look forward to bringing my ideas and experience to the table at Finance.
Given the broad scope of Finance’s jurisdiction, and the critical importance of these issues to the day-to-day lives of all North Carolinians and all Americans, I look forward to the challenges that this new opportunity brings.
Also this week, I introduced a bill that holds the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) accountable for funds saved through competitive bidding for major VA medical facilities. The legislation mandates that VA obtain congressional approval to expand the scope of a previously authorized project if it wishes to use funds saved as a result of a favorable bidding environment.
This is common sense and fair legislation that will apply any bid savings toward projects that are already on the waiting list. Congress can help VA maximize the use of the limited funding available for construction projects by properly allocating them where they are most needed.

Finally, I want to address a bill I introduced last week to increase efficiency and cut spending by combining the Department of Energy and the EPA into a single, streamlined agency.  This legislation would not make any changes to our nation’s pollution laws or energy policy, nor would it reduce current enforcement responsibilities. In his State of the Union address earlier this year, the President proposed merging and consolidating federal agencies, and this bill advances that proposal. I think we can all agree that decreasing administrative costs by combining duplicative support and administrative functions is a common sense way to reduce government sense spending.  You can read more about this bill by clicking here.
Stay tuned to my website, as well as my Facebook and Twitter pages, as the Senate debates important issues including budget reforms in the coming weeks.

Sincerely, 

U.S. Senator Richard Burr

Press Release from Senator Burr on Combining EPA and DOE

Below is a press release from Senator Burr on his sponsorship of legislation that would create a Mega-Government organization by combining the US Environmental Agency and the US Department of Energy.

 

May 5, 2011 – 3:52 PM

Burr Bill Cuts Spending, Increases Efficiency by Combining Dept. of Energy and EPA

[Share This]

Today, U.S. Senator Richard Burr (R-North Carolina) introduced a bill that would consolidate the Department of Energy and the Environmental Protection Agency into a single, new agency called the Department of Energy and Environment (DOEE).  The bill would provide cost savings by combining duplicative functions while improving the administration of energy and environmental policies by ensuring a coordinated approach.

“The amount of money wasted annually on duplicative programs within the federal government is staggering,” Senator Burr said.  “This common-sense approach will reduce duplicative and wasteful functions across these two agencies and streamline our approach to a comprehensive, coordinated energy and environmental policy.”

The DOEE would combine support and administrative offices of the two agencies and would take the recommendations from the Government Accountability Office (GAO) and Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to eliminate ineffective or duplicative programs.  Core functions of each agency would be maintained.

By implementing suggestions made by GAO and the President’s 2012 budget request, this bill could result in over $3 billion in savings in the next year alone.

Current co-sponsors of the legislation are: Jim Demint (R-SC), Mike Enzi (R-WY), John Thune (R-SD), John McCain (R-AZ), Dan Coats (R-IN), Richard Shelby (R-AL), John Barasso (R-WY), Roy Blunt (R-MO), John Boozman (R-AR), Thad Cochran (R-MS), Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-TX), David Vitter (R-LA), Orrin Hatch (R-UT), Ron Johnson (R-WI), Mike Lee (R-UT).

A Message from Senator Burr, May 6, 2011

Below is a message from Senator Burr. Yet again, Senator Burr shows his “Big Government” propensity. Senator Burr cosponsored and voted for a huge increase in government with the passage of the Food Safety Act. Now he is sponsoring a bill to create a huge mega-government agency by combining the US Environmental Protection Agency and the US Department of Energy. Never mind that except for a small portion of environmental remediation in the Department of Energy neither of these agencies have anything in common. Also, never mind that both of these agencies should be down-sized significantly instead of combined to create a single mega-government agency each which has shown to overstep their regulatory authority. Senator Burr continues to be completely out of touch with the direction we the people want to see our government head – which is to be much, much SMALLER!

 

A Message from Senator Burr

After a Congressional recess, I was back in Washington this week where, like they were all across the country, everyone was talking about the outstanding work of our Special Forces and the death of Osama bin Laden.  This is a major development in our fight against terrorism and proves our resolve to hold accountable those who harm American citizens.  However, we must remain vigilant and not lose focus on the overall mission and our goal of eradicating terrorist threats.  There still remains a dire threat posed by bin Laden’s followers and the seeds of hate he planted across the globe, and while we are immensely grateful for this victory, our work is far from over.  I spoke with several news outlets, both national and local, this week about this development.  To watch an interview I did with Fox’s Shepard Smith, click here.  To listen to my conversation on KZL’s Murphy in the Morning show, click here.
While the death of bin Laden understandably dominated most of the news this week, legislative business continued in the Senate.  On Thursday, I introduced a bill that would cut government spending and increase efficiency in federal agencies by consolidating the Department of Energy and the Environmental Protection Agency into a single, new agency called the Department of Energy and Environment.  This common-sense approach will reduce duplicative and wasteful functions across these two agencies and streamline our approach to a comprehensive, coordinated energy and environmental policy.  During this Congress, I will be introducing similar bills that combine other agencies in an attempt to reduce wasteful spending and increase government efficiency.  To read more about this bill, click here.
I also was proud to introduce a resolution designating today, May 6, as Military Spouse Appreciation Day.  This day is an opportunity to make sure that the spouses of the men and women in our military know that their fellow citizens recognize the sacrifices they make and appreciate their valuable contributions.  These spouses serve our country in unique ways and do so knowing that their loved ones may be in harm’s way, and the difficulty that they endure helps make our country stronger.  Thank you to the men and women who support our servicemembers.
On a similar note, I attended a reception yesterday honoring this year’s Military Spouses of the Year.  All five branches of the Armed Services bestowed the award on a spouse from their branch, and two were from North Carolina.  Crystal Cavalier from Cameron was the Spouse of the Year for the Army and Bianca Strzalkowski from Fuquary-Varina represented the Marine Corps.  Ultimately, Bianca was chosen as the Military Spouse of the Year for all the branches.  These spouses, along with the representatives from the Navy, Air Force, and Coast Guard represent the millions of past and present military spouses who continue to show resilience in a wartime environment, dedicating their lives and families to the service of a grateful nation and give back to their communities.
Stay tuned as the Senate takes up FY2012 budget proposals, and hopefully important budget reforms, in the coming weeks.

Sincerely, 

U.S. Senator Richard Burr

Email from Rep. John Boehner

April 12, 2011

Mr. Ludrick Kukulinski
202 Meadows Ln
Newport, NC 28570-9493

Dear Mr. Kukulinski:

Thank you for taking the time to contact me. It’s good to hear from you.

Your ideas, comments, and questions help make possible my goal of leading a House of Representatives that listens and reflects the will of the American people. That’s why I’d like to ask you to keep speaking out by:

 

I made a Pledge to America to focus on removing government barriers to private-sector job creation and economic growth – that includes cutting spending to help end the uncertainty facing job creators; repealing the job-crushing health care law and replacing it with common sense reforms that lower costs; reining in excessive regulations; and promoting an American Energy Initiative that increases energy production to create jobs and lower energy prices. I also pledged to lead an effort to reform Congress and rebuild the bonds of trust between the American people and their representatives in Washington. I hope you’ll stay engaged and keep me updated on your thoughts as we work to keep this pledge.

Thank you again for contacting me and please stay in touch.

Sincerely,

thumbnail

John Boehner
Speaker of the House

Email from Walter Jones Explaining His Vote for Budget

Dear Mr. Kukulinski:

 

Thank you for contacting me with you concerns on the 2011 budget crisis.  I appreciate you taking the time to contact me and I am happy to respond.

 

Our country is quickly going broke.  We are faced with the reality that the federal government is already over $14 trillion in debt, with much of that money owed to foreign governments who do not have our best interests in mind.  On top of that,  America’s out of control spending policies are resulting in annual deficits of over $1.5 trillion.

 

As you may know, unlike previous fiscal years, Congress has used a series of short term measures called “continuing resolutions” to fund the government.  Previously, I did not vote for any of the previous continuing resolutions for the following reasons.  First, I do not believe they came close to cutting enough spending.  As previously mentioned,  America’s projected federal deficit this year is $1.65 trillion.  Cutting $100 billion from that deficit is a nice gesture, but it only gets us one-sixteenth of the way to a balanced budget.  We can and must do better.  Furthermore, I was disappointed that H.R. 1 only included steep cuts to domestic non-defense discretionary spending, while leaving entitlement spending and funding for foreign wars untouched.  Domestic non-defense discretionary spending –which includes funding for highways and waterways, clean water, energy, national parks, federal law enforcement and many other things – accounts for roughly $660 billion, or 20 percent, of annual federal spending.  To put this in perspective, all domestic non-defense discretionary spending could be completely eliminated and we’d still have to find another roughly $900 billion dollars in spending cuts just to balance the budget this year.  The reality is that if Congress and the President are serious about putting this country on a sustainable fiscal path, we have no other choice but to reform entitlement programs and radically downsize overseas spending in addition to cutting domestic discretionary spending.

 

With that said, I was gravely disappointed in President Obama and the Senate’s lack of leadership in responding to House Republicans to negotiate a long-term continuing resolution to avert a government shutdown.  They appeared to be perfectly willing to shut down the government and continue taking a paycheck while our men and women in uniform and their families went without one in order to protect taxpayer funding for organizations like Planned Parenthood.  In my opinion, that’s just not right.  I believe strongly that if the federal government shuts down, Members of Congress and the President should not be paid.  I also believe strongly that the men and women of armed forces and their families should continue to be paid regardless.  To do otherwise would be unacceptable.  For that reason, while the compromise agreement to avert a government shutdown is not perfect, I will vote for it.

 

This is one of a series of small first steps on the long road to restoring  America’s fiscal future.  Bigger battles are just around the corner.  As they come, please be assured that I will continue to fight to stop wasteful spending, reduce the deficit and put our country back on track.  Thanks again for sharing your concerns with me.  If I can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me.

 

 
Sincerely,

Walter B. Jones
Member of Congress

Email from Rep. Walter Jones, 3/28/2011

Dear Mr. Broyles:

 

Thank you for responding with your questions and comments for the Subcommittee on Domestic Monetary Policy and Technology’s hearing on March 17.  I greatly appreciate you taking the time to respond.

 

Given our economic condition, this issue is a huge concern.  Prior to the last Subcommittee meeting, I received roughly 1,000 Eastern North Carolinians’ thoughts and questions.  Again, the responses were numerous.  I enjoy hearing your thoughts and ideas and I will continue to reach out for your feedback throughout the year.

 

Some who wrote in supported the Federal Reserve’s policy of “Quantitative Easing”.  However, most wrote in with grave concerns on how they will maintain their standard of living.  People in  Eastern North Carolina and around the world are being squeezed at the gas pump and the grocery store as they struggle to make ends meet in a world in which their salaries have no chance of keeping up with Mr. Bernanke’s printing presses. Many of the messages I read echoed these same everyday struggles at the gas pump and grocery store.  The Fed’s dangerous, inflation-creating, money-printing policies are severely damaging  America ‘s consumers at a time when they can least afford it.

 

While I was only able to ask the panel of witnesses a few of the questions submitted, please know that I and my staff read each and every one of the messages sent in.  Further, I have tried to share the sentiments (including those of folks who disagree with my criticisms of the Federal Reserve) with my colleagues, and with the staff of the House Financial Services Committee.  I assure you this topic is of the utmost importance, and I will keep your questions and concerns in mind as we continue this fight.

 

Thank you again for taking the time to share your thoughts.  If I can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me.

 
Sincerely,

Walter B. Jones
Member of Congress

Email from Senator Hagan re. Accomplishments

March 24, 2011

Dear Friend,

Thank you for your interest in my office.  I wanted to take this opportunity to update you on some of the major accomplishments of the past two years, and to share with you my goals for the current session of Congress.

National Debt

I have worked with my colleagues across the aisle to combat what the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Admiral Mike Mullen, declared to be the greatest threat to our national security: our national debt.  The national debt has been piling up to dangerous levels over the past decade, due in large part to two wars, two tax cuts, and an expensive prescription drug program. On top of that, the severe economic recession that began in 2007 greatly reduced federal revenues and led to higher deficit spending as Congress took steps to stimulate the economy and unfreeze credit markets. I understand that our country cannot sustain continued deficit spending far into the future.  Addressing this looming crisis should be among our highest priorities.

I believe it is critical that we address our fiscal challenges head on, and I was among a group of senators who advocated for the creation of the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform, which was announced by President Obama on February 18, 2010.

The 18-member Commission was co-chaired by former White House Chief of Staff Erskine Bowles of North Carolina, and former Republican Senator Alan Simpson of Wyoming. The group was tasked with producing recommendations for reducing the deficit, and its leaders showed tremendous leadership throughout the process. On December 1, 2010, the Commission published its final report, which you can read here: http://www.fiscalcommission.gov/.

While I certainly understand the concerns that have been expressed with some of the recommendations in the Commission’s report, and I do not agree with everything in it, I believe that the commissioners showed remarkable courage by addressing a wide range of issues, from tax policy to health care costs. Most importantly, their report will help keep the process of addressing our fiscal outlook moving forward. On December 3rd, I was one of 14 senators who sent a letter to the White House and the bipartisan congressional leadership, urging them to address our pressing fiscal challenges by considering the Commission’s report.

Jobs

Job creation remains my number one priority. In March 2010, Congress passed the Hiring Incentives to Restore Employment Act, more commonly known as the HIRE Act. The legislation provides tax credits to employers that hire and retain employees who have been out of work for at least 60 days and eases the tax burden on small businesses that purchase certain capital equipment. Increasing the general business tax credit and extending certain HIRE Act provisions will encourage employers to create jobs and hire unemployed Americans.

I believe that small businesses are the backbone of the North Carolina economy. Small firms represent more than 98 percent of North Carolina employers and are responsible for nearly half the jobs in our state. The Small Business Jobs Act (H.R. 5297) was signed into law in September 2010. This important legislation included an amendment I cosponsored that will create a $30 billion small business lending fund for community banks.

I supported the bipartisan Small Business Jobs Act because it will help small businesses create more than 50,000 new jobs nationwide. Additionally, this legislation will not add to our nation’s deficit. As a member of the Senate Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship, I will continue to be a strong advocate for North Carolina’s small businesses.

Wall Street Reform

The financial crisis also exposed critical gaps and weaknesses in our financial regulatory system. Massive risks in financial markets went undetected by both regulators and market participants. Even if those risks had been exposed earlier, regulators lacked the power to mount an effective response. These systematic failures caused a dramatic loss of confidence in our financial institutions and helped to cause the worst downturn since the Great Depression. Congress had to take action to ensure that American taxpayers will never again have to bail out our financial institutions and that these institutions treat consumers fairly and responsibly.

The Restoring American Financial Stability Act of 2010 was enacted on July 21st to provide better oversight in the financial sector. The bill reforms the current financial regulatory structure into a more stable and transparent system that will protect consumers, provide clear and fair regulations for financial firms, and restore confidence in the financial markets.

I supported this legislation because it embodies common sense financial reform that protects consumers, levels the playing field for community banks and provides fair and clear regulations for all financial institutions. North Carolina is a leader in the banking industry, and both our state’s banks and its banking customers will benefit from the financial reforms found in the law. The law will close gaps and eradicate inefficiencies in America’s current regulatory structure. I am proud to represent North Carolina in supporting legislation that works to ensure that American taxpayers will never again have to bear the cost of a financial crisis.

Supporting our troops

North Carolina is the most military-friendly state in the country. Approximately 35 percent of North Carolinians serve in the military, have an immediate family member who serves, or is a veteran. There are close to 120,000 active duty military personnel stationed in North Carolina. There are approximately 25,000 National Guardsman and Reservists that live in all 100 counties of North Carolina.

During my past two years in the United States Senate, I have visited our troops in Afghanistan three times. Many of the troops deployed in Afghanistan are from North Carolina and come from North Carolina military installations. They are leading the charge against terrorism abroad to protect us here at home. I continue to be impressed by the incredible job our military is doing to disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-Qaeda in Afghanistan. These brave men and women are doing an extremely difficult job under trying circumstances and need our support now more than ever. I pledge to continue supporting our troops who make the greatest sacrifice to preserve and defend our freedom.

Behind every Soldier, Sailor, Airman and Marine there is a family at home that also deserves our support. As a founding member of the Military Family Caucus I strongly support giving the necessary resources to military family support programs and pledge to continue doing so in the 112th Congress.

There are also nearly 800,000 veterans who live in North Carolina.

I have always been a strong supporter of our nation’s veterans. As a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, I am working to ensure that our military men and women have the support they need as they as they transition from the military to civilian life. Furthermore, it is my belief that our veterans deserve stability and certainty in their benefits. That is why I cosponsored the Veterans Health Care Budget Reform and Transparency Act of 2009. The bill requires, beginning in fiscal year 2011, that Congress appropriate funding for the VA two years in advance, eliminating many of the delays and much of the uncertainty created by partisan budget fights in Washington, D.C.  The Department of Veterans Affairs and VA facilities across the country will be able to more effectively conduct business and planning, resulting in more efficient and effective services for our veterans.

The 111th Session of Congress was certainly eventful.  But we have to keep moving forward.  I am excited to continue working in a bipartisan manner on legislative priorities that will directly affect the people of North Carolina.

I will continue to focus on creating jobs in North Carolina. In January of this year it was announced that North Carolina is one of the first two states in the nation to receive funds from a new initiative in the Small Business Jobs Act. The funds will strengthen state programs that leverage private lending for small businesses and manufacturers. The North Carolina District of the Small Business Administration has already approved 414 loans for $198.2 million during the first three months of fiscal year 2011. This is a 37 percent increase in U.S. Small Business Administration loans directed to North Carolina businesses over the first quarter of 2010.

I also recently became a member of the Senate Banking Committee. As a member of the committee, I will focus on encouraging the availability of capital to businesses, which will, in turn, help create jobs; ensuring access to safe and affordable credit for families; and making sure our country’s mortgage system is both robust and stable so that hard-working families are able to own their own homes.

I will continue to support those who serve in our military. North Carolina troops are leading the charge against terrorism in Afghanistan. I have visited troops on the ground in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Kuwait and met with military personnel in Pakistan. I will continue to support those who make the greatest sacrifice for our country. As a founding member of the Military Family Caucus I strongly support giving the necessary resources to military family support programs and pledge to continue doing so in the 112th Congress.

I am deeply committed to keeping our promises to our veterans. I will continue working to ensure they receive the care and support they deserve. I strongly oppose cutting existing benefits for our country’s soldiers and veterans, and their families, who have risked everything for our country.

During my time in Congress I pledge to continue working to represent North Carolinians to the best of my ability. I encourage you to visit my website, www.hagan.senate.gov, to learn more about my legislative priorities.

Again, thank you for contacting my office. It is truly an honor to represent North Carolina in the United States Senate, and I hope you will not hesitate to contact me in the future should you have any further questions or concerns.

Sincerely,

Signature

Kay R. Hagan

Email from Senator Hagan re. Extension of Unemployment Benefits

March 9, 2011

Dear Friend,

Thank you for contacting me regarding the extension of unemployment insurance benefits.  I greatly appreciate hearing your thoughts on this important issue.

On December 17, 2010, the Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization and Job Creation Act of 2010 was signed into law by President Obama. The bill extends the tax rates first enacted in 2001 and 2003 for all individual income tax brackets for two years, in addition to extending a number of other federal tax cuts and credits. These extensions include the Earned Income Tax Credit and the Child Tax Credit, the Alternative Minimum Tax exemption, marriage penalty relief, and the American Opportunity Tax Credit. The bill also extends the tax rate on dividends and long-term capital gains income, and sets the estate and gift tax exemption at $5 million per person with a top tax rate of 35 percent.

The legislation also reauthorizes the enhanced unemployment benefits program for 13 months. Without the passage of this provision over 230,000 North Carolina families would have been at serious risk of seeing their unemployment benefits expire.

I did not support this overall bill because it will raise our national debt by $858 billion without any long-term plan to address our national deficit. I believe it is time for Congress to tighten its belt, like American families must do daily.  However, I do support the extension of enhanced unemployment insurance programs during these difficult economic times. During Senate consideration of the bill, I supported an amendment sponsored by Senator Charles Schumer (D-NY) that would have permanently extended income tax cuts for middle class Americans, while allowing the tax cuts for people making over $1 million per year to expire.  This amendment also included the provision extending enhanced unemployment benefits.

As you know, families all across North Carolina are facing a difficult time making ends meet. I look forward to continuing my work during the 112th Congress to improve our economy and get more Americans back to work.

Again, thank you for contacting my office. It is truly an honor to represent North Carolina in the United States Senate, and I hope you will not hesitate to contact me in the future should you have any further questions or concerns.

Sincerely,

Signature

Kay R. Hagan

Email from Senator Hagan, 3/18/11 re Health Care

March 18, 2011

Dear Friend,

Thank you for contacting me regarding the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act. I appreciate hearing your thoughts on this important issue. I apologize for my delayed response.

Since the start of the health reform debate over two years ago, I have carefully examined how this legislation will impact our state. I have listened to the personal stories and concerns of constituents and have been extremely focused on working to ensure that our health care system works for every North Carolina family. In these last two years, I have received hundreds of thousands of letters, emails, and telephone calls from North Carolinians, and I truly appreciated hearing your views on many of the issues discussed.

In March 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act became law. Currently, there is a lot of discussion about repealing this legislation. Throughout the health reform debate, I consistently heard stories from North Carolinians who were denied health insurance because they had a “preexisting condition,” or had been dropped from their insurance plans once they became sick. Repealing this legislation would only create countless more stories from people denied coverage.  Through its various provisions, health reform will help an estimated 32 million people that previously were without health insurance to secure medical coverage. A 2009 study in the American Journal of Public Health found 45,000 people a year died because they lacked health insurance. Quite simply, I believe North Carolina’s families deserve better than this.

In addition, our current health care spending is simply unsustainable. Each year, costs associated with our current health care system increase. Ten years ago, North Carolinians paid $6,000 in annual family premiums. Today those premiums cost more than $12,000. With these reforms, we will reduce health care costs for families, seniors, and small businesses, not just in the next few years, but also for the long term.

Another important consideration in the discussion of repealing health reform is the cost to our federal deficit. In January 2011, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated that repealing the health care overhaul would increase the deficit by a total of $230 billion over 10 years. Our country cannot sustain continued deficit spending far into the future and I am working to enact a number of policies that will help address our nation’s deficit and debt.

Although the various provisions in this historic legislation will be implemented over time, many critical protections have already gone into effect in the last year. These provisions have expanded access to high quality, accessible, and affordable health insurance for thousands of North Carolinians. I would like to bring your attention to several of these provisions.

Starting on September 23, 2010, the new law ended some of the worst insurance company abuses and provided important new benefits for you and your family. First, the new law prohibits insurance companies from refusing coverage to or limiting the benefits of children (up to age 19) because of a preexisting medical condition. This prohibition applies to all health plans offered by employers and when an individual purchases a new policy. In 2014, discriminating against all individuals who have a preexisting condition will be prohibited. Second, the law prohibits all insurance plans from putting lifetime caps on the dollar amount that they will spend on benefits. In the past, patients with cancer or other chronic diseases ran the risk of hitting a lifetime cap and losing access to care. The law also restricts most insurance companies’ use of low annual dollar limits on benefits. In 2014, annual limits will be eliminated. Third, the law prohibits all insurance plans from canceling your coverage because of an unintentional mistake on an application.

Also beginning on September 23, 2010, if your plan covers children, you can now add or keep your children on your health insurance policy until they turn 26 years old. Prior to health reform, insurance plans could remove enrolled children — usually at age 19, sometimes older for full-time students. By allowing children to stay on their parents’ plan, health reform makes it easier and more affordable for young adults to get health insurance coverage. If health reform legislation were repealed, an estimated 37,300 young adults in North Carolina would lose their insurance coverage through their parents’ health plans.

On July 1, 2010, a new Preexisting Condition Insurance Plan program went into effect. This program offers uninsured individuals with preexisting conditions coverage in special state-based “pools” at an affordable rate. Prior to health reform, many people with illnesses or disabilities were unable to obtain private health insurance or the coverage offered to them was so costly that they could not afford it. For more information on this program, visit www.inclusivehealth.org

Over 120,235 North Carolina small businesses are also now eligible for a small business tax credit to make premiums more affordable. This small business tax credit gives small employers the ability to offer insurance to their workers. Tax credits will be provided up to 35% of the employer’s eligible premium expenses for tax years 2010-2013. Beginning in tax year 2014, employers can receive a tax credit for up to 50% of the cost of the premiums.

Effective January 1, 2014, most individuals who can afford it will be required to obtain basic health insurance coverage or pay a penalty. If affordable coverage is not available to an individual, he or she will be eligible for an exemption or will be able to utilize new tax credits to help them afford health insurance. Medicaid will also be extended to Americans with low incomes of up to $14,000 for an individual or $29,000 for a family of four in 2010 dollars. If your employer doesn’t offer insurance, you will be able to buy insurance directly in an Exchange — a new transparent and competitive insurance marketplace where individuals and small businesses can buy affordable insurance coverage.

Health reform also made needed improvements that will keep Medicare strong and solvent. Guaranteed Medicare benefits won’t change-whether beneficiaries get them through Original Medicare or a Medicare Advantage plan. Instead, beneficiaries will see new benefits and cost savings, and an increased focus on quality. Most importantly, seniors in North Carolina can more easily afford their medications. Last year, over 97,000 North Carolina seniors who hit the prescription drug “donut hole” received a $250 rebate check. The donut hole will be incrementally closed over the next several years until it is completely closed by 2020. Beginning this year, beneficiaries who reach the coverage gap will receive a 50% discount when buying Part D-covered brand-name prescription drugs. In addition, the 1.5 million Medicare beneficiaries in North Carolina are now eligible for an annual wellness visit with their doctor without cost-sharing or out-of-pocket payments.  This wellness visit includes free preventive care services like colorectal cancer screening and mammograms.

Like you, I am concerned about rising health insurance premiums, which is one of the many reasons I supported health care reform. Health care reform includes new resources and authorities to crack down on unjustified rate hikes. Today, 46 states, including North Carolina, are using resources under the new reform law to pass or strengthen rate review laws, which will help to keep rates low. This year, the law requires insurance companies to publicly justify, on their websites, any unreasonable premium increases.

If health reform is repealed, all of these protections would be taken away from North Carolinians and insurance companies would be put back in control over your health care – discriminating against individuals with preexisting conditions and canceling coverage when people get sick. It would also allow insurance premiums to continue to skyrocket – forcing many families to choose between purchasing food and paying for a place to live or being able to purchase necessary health care. This would be bad for North Carolinians, bad for business, and bad for our economy.

So much information is circulating about health care reform, and sorting through it can be overwhelming and frustrating. I encourage you to visit my website, www.hagan.senate.gov, where I have factual information about what the law does and what it means to you and your family. Other useful information about health care reform can be found at http://www.healthcare.gov. Finally, do not hesitate to call my office if you have a specific question about the health care reform law.

Again, thank you for contacting my office. It is truly an honor to represent North Carolina in the United States Senate, and I hope you will not hesitate to contact me in the future should you have any further questions or concerns.

Sincerely,

Signature

Kay R. Hagan

Email from Walter Jones, 3/21/11, Immigration

Dear Mr. Broyles:

 

Thank you for contacting me to share your concerns regarding immigration enforcement.  I appreciate you taking the time to contact me and I’m honored to respond.

 

Like you, I am deeply concerned about  America ‘s lack of immigration enforcement.  I have been, and will continue to be, a strong supporter of initiatives to strengthen enforcement and an opponent of efforts to reqard those who break our immigration laws.  You will be happy to learn that I have cosponsored a number of bills that would do just that, including:

 

  • H.R. 140, the Birthright Citizenship Act would clarify that children born in the  United States to illegal immigrants are not granted citizenship, ending the process of birthright citizenship.

 

  • H.R. 100, the CLEAR Act of 2011 would provide resources for state and local agencies to assist in the enforcement of our nation’s immigration laws.

 

  • H.R. 280 and H.R. 282 would each require contractors to participate in the E-Verify program as a condition of any work for the federal government (H.R. 282), and within the United States Capitol Complex (H.R. 280).

 

  • H.R. 787, The No Social Security for Illegal Immigrants Act, would ensure that illegal immigrants would not receive social security.

 

  • H.R. 692, the Nuclear Family Priority Act would end the process of “chain migration” where countless non-nuclear family members of immigrants are allowed to immigrate into the  United States .

 

  • H.R. 152, the National Guard Border Enforcement Act would direct the Secretary of Defense to make National Guard troops available for border security upon the request of a  US Governor.

 

Please know that I will continue to do all I can to secure borders and to oppose amnesty for those who break our immigration laws.

 

Again, thanks for sharing your concerns with me. If you have any questions on other immigration legislation, please feel free to contact me.

 
Sincerely,

Walter B. Jones
Member of Congress

Email from Walter Jones, 3/21/11

Congressman Jones did not answer the heart of the question, which was “what are you doing to defund the $105 billion already funded in the Obamacare Law?”

 

Dear Mr. Lang:

Thank you for contacting me about the funding of Obamacare in the Continuing Resolution (CR).  I appreciate you sharing your thoughts and I am happy to respond.

Let me be clear: I strongly opposed and voted against Obamacare.  I support its repeal and have cosponsored every bill introduced that would do that.  I have joined many of my colleagues in filing multiple amicus briefs in support of several states’ efforts to overturn the law in court on constitutional grounds.  I also strongly support cutting off funding for implementation of Obamacare, and have voted accordingly; this includes my vote against the most recent continuing resolution to fund the government, because it did not, among other things, cut off all funding for Obamacare.

Please rest assured that I will be vigilant in supporting all efforts to repeal, block or cut off funding for this government takeover of our health care system.

I appreciate you taking the time to share your thoughts on this critical issue. If I can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me.


Sincerely,

Walter B. Jones
Member of Congress

Email from Senator Hagan re. Earmarks

March 16, 2011

Dear Friend,

Thank you for contacting me with your concerns about congressionally directed spending items in appropriations bills, which are more commonly known as earmarks. I share your concerns about using taxpayer dollars wisely and the need to rein in our national debt as soon as we possibly can.

As you probably know, earmarks are project-based requests that usually benefit municipalities, universities and community-based organizations. In 2007, Congress instituted strict reforms in both the Senate and House of Representatives that brought more transparency to the appropriations process. Since that time, Congress has reduced the number of earmarks by more than 50 percent. Senators making project requests were required to post them publicly on their Web sites, including the name and location of the intended recipient, the amount requested, and the purpose of the project. Funding for these requests is not guaranteed; they must be reviewed and approved by both the Appropriations Committee and the full Senate.

Given the size of our national debt and the urgent need to reduce it, both Republicans and Democrats have recognized the need to rein in federal spending, including earmarks. At the end of the 111th Congress, Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Daniel Inouye pledged to forego earmark requests for two years, which the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform recommended.

The Commission showed tremendous leadership and produced a set of bipartisan recommendations to help us get the national debt under control. To read its final report, which was released on December 1, 2010, please visit http://www.fiscalcommission.gov/. On December 3, 2010, I was one of 14 senators who sent a letter to the White House and the bipartisan congressional leadership, urging them to address our pressing fiscal challenges by considering the Commission’s report.

As Congress considers deficit-reduction measures and budget proposals for fiscal years 2011 and 2012, I will certainly keep your thoughts about earmarks and federal spending in mind. I look forward to working with my colleagues in a bipartisan fashion to put our fiscal house back in order.

Again, thank you for contacting my office. It is truly an honor to represent North Carolina in the United States Senate, and I hope you will not hesitate to contact me in the future should you have any further questions or concerns.

Sincerely,

Signature

Kay R. Hagan

Email from Senator Hagan re. Federal Spending & the National Debt

March 14, 2011

Dear Friend,

Thank you for contacting me regarding federal spending and the national debt. I share your concerns about the need to encourage fiscal responsibility and use taxpayer dollars wisely.

Our nation’s debt has been accumulating dangerously over the last decade, primarily as a result of not paying for two wars, two tax cuts, and an expensive prescription drug program. On top of that, the severe economic recession that began in 2007 led to lower tax revenues and higher deficit spending as Congress took steps to unfreeze credit markets and revive the economy. All of these factors combined to put us on a fiscally unsustainable path that must be rectified. I understand that our country cannot continue deficit spending far into the future and I am working to enact a number of policies that will help address our nation’s deficit and debt.

During the 111th Congress, I voted for an amendment to H.J. Res. 45 to reinstate the budget principle known as “pay-as-you-go,” which requires that legislation increasing the deficit be offset by measures that reduce the deficit by an equal amount. It will help ensure that we do not burden future generations with the bill of our policies today. That amendment was agreed to by a vote of 60-39, and I believe it is a good start to controlling deficit spending.

In an effort to strengthen the pay-as-you-go budget principle and reduce the deficit, I have supported numerous bipartisan amendments to establish a five-year cap on discretionary spending. Discretionary spending caps have a proven track record of controlling government spending and reducing the deficit. In the 1990s, both discretionary spending caps and pay-as-you-go policies were in place under bipartisan agreements, and produced four balanced budgets and budget surpluses from 1998-2001. The five-year cap on non-security discretionary spending in President Obama’s 2012 budget is a good start, but we must take a comprehensive approach to deficit reduction that includes entitlement spending and tax reform.

In addition, I also supported a proposal offered by Senators Kent Conrad (D-ND) and Judd Gregg (R-NH) to create a bipartisan commission to address our long-term deficits. While that proposal did not receive the 60 votes required to pass, I was encouraged when President Obama announced plans for a similar commission co-chaired by former White House Chief of Staff Erskine Bowles, of North Carolina, and former Senate Republican leader Alan Simpson.

I was among the group of senators who advocated for the creation of the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform, which President Obama created on February 18, 2010. The 18-member Commission was tasked with producing recommendations for reducing the deficit, and its leaders showed tremendous leadership throughout the process. On December 1, 2010, the Commission published its final report, which you can read here: http://www.fiscalcommission.gov/.

The Commission produced a set of bipartisan recommendations to help us get the national debt under control. Although a majority of commissioners supported the final report, it did not receive enough support to trigger automatic consideration in Congress. I do not agree with everything in the report, but I believe that the commissioners showed tremendous courage by addressing a wide range of issues, from tax policy to health care costs. Most importantly, their work will help keep the process of addressing our fiscal outlook moving forward. On December 3, 2010, I was one of 14 senators who sent a letter to the White House and the bipartisan congressional leadership, urging them to address our pressing fiscal challenges by considering the Commission’s report.

As Congress considers deficit-reduction measures and budget proposals for fiscal years 2011 and 2012, I will certainly keep your thoughts about federal spending in mind. I look forward to working with my colleagues in a bipartisan fashion to put our fiscal house back in order.

Again, thank you for contacting my office. It is truly an honor to represent North Carolina in the United States Senate, and I hope you will not hesitate to contact me in the future should you have any further questions or concerns.

Sincerely,

Signature

Kay R. Hagan

Email from Senator Kay Hagan re. the 111th Congress

March 14, 2011

Dear Friend,

Thank you for contacting me to express your concerns about the final weeks of the 111th Congress. I appreciate you sharing your thoughts with me.

As you know, this “lame duck” session was an unusually productive period for the United States Congress, due primarily to strong bipartisanship among Republicans and Democrats. While President Obama and congressional leaders struck a deal on a two-year extension of the Bush-era tax cuts (H.R. 4853), I voted against this bill because it would add too much to the national debt. While I supported some provisions in the bill, I could not vote in favor of legislation that would add $858 billion to our national debt without offering any long-term solutions.

Also during the lame duck session, I joined 70 other senators who voted to ratify the START nuclear arms treaty with Russia, an agreement supported by Secretary of Defense Robert Gates and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mike Mullen. The treaty will strengthen strategic nuclear weapons stability with Russia and modernize our nuclear weapons and delivery systems. Along with Secretary Gates and Chairman Mullen, I also supported a repeal of the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy (H.R. 2965), which passed by a bipartisan vote of 65-31.

Two other important pieces of legislation passed during the final weeks of the 111th Congress will protect our nation’s food supply and ensure that our September 11th heroes get the health care they desperately need and deserve. The Food Safety Modernization Act (S. 510) seeks to reduce food-borne illnesses and prevent erroneous recalls that cost farmers, including ones in North Carolina, millions of dollars. Senator Jon Tester (D-MT) and I fought hard to add an amendment to the bill that will protect small farmers by exempting them from unnecessary red tape. The Senate also passed the James Zadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Act (H.R. 847), which will provide 9/11 first-responders with access to care for health problems stemming directly from their efforts to respond to the terrorist attack on our nation.

I have always felt that elected officials should do more to work across the aisle to pass legislation that benefits all Americans. I have strived to promote bipartisanship among my colleagues in the Senate and will continue to do so in the 112th Congress. I pledge to work with individuals from all political backgrounds as I champion the interests of North Carolina.

Again, thank you for contacting my office. It is truly an honor to represent North Carolina in the United States Senate, and I hope you will not hesitate to contact me in the future should you have any further questions or concerns.

Sincerely,

Signature

Kay R. Hagan

Email from Walter Jones re. Fair Tax

Dear Mr. Broyles:

 

Thank you for your recent email regarding the Fair Tax. I appreciate you taking the time to contact me and I’m grateful for the opportunity to respond.

 

You’re exactly right –  America desperately needs fundamental tax reform. The current code is far too costly, inefficient and inequitable. Without question, this great nation can do much, much better. I strongly believe that Congress should quickly hold hearings on all proposals to scrap the code and institute a new system of raising federal revenue, including the Fair Tax. Democrats should have taken this approach when they were in control, but sadly that opportunity was wasted. Hopefully this will not continue.

 

We must keep pushing to raise awareness about the need for this critically important change. Thanks again for taking the time to contact me about this issue. If you have further questions about other federal matters, please don’t hesitate to contact me.

 

 
Sincerely,

Walter B. Jones
Member of Congress

From the Office of Governor Bev Perdue

Interesting SPIN…

 

House sustains veto

Gov. Perdue vetoed House Bill 2, titled the “North Carolina Health Care Protection Act,” citing questions about the bill’s constitutionality, necessity and unintended consequences.

On Wednesday, the N.C. House sustained the veto.

“This is an ill-conceived piece of legislation that’s not good for the people of North Carolina,” Gov. Perdue said last week when she vetoed the bill.

Gov. Perdue’s priorities remain jobs, education and resetting state government. She said this week she looks forward to working with the General Assembly on those issues.

The constitutionality of the federal health care law is already going to be decided in the U.S. Supreme Court, which made House Bill 2 unnecessary, Gov. Perdue said. There were also serious questions about whether the bill itself would have been constitutional and whether it would have cost North Carolina federal Medicaid funding.

To see a short video clip about Gov. Perdue’s veto, click here.

veto still.jpg

Gov. Perdue announces accelerated start dates for road projects

Gov. Bev Perdue announced that several Urban Loop projects scheduled to begin between 2014 and 2019 will begin earlier, because of available cash and cost-savings from a favorable construction environment.

While no additional money exists to add new Loop projects to the construction schedule, the N.C. Department of Transportation expects to see additional savings of about $50 million by being able to take advantage of today’s lower real estate and construction costs, which could move forward other Loops in their priority order.

At a transportation roundtable event in Charlotte U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood praised Gov. Perdue’s aggressiveness and leadership on transportation issues. Watch a clip here.

lahood still.jpgThe accelerated projects are:

Charlotte I-485 widening:

Construction will begin in 2012, two years sooner.

Greensboro Western Loop:

Part C (Bryan Boulevard to Battleground Avenue) – Construction will begin in 2013, one year sooner.

Part D (Battleground Avenue to Lawndale Drive) – Buying right of way will begin in 2011, eight years sooner.

Greensboro Eastern Loop:

Part B (US 70 to US 29) – Buying right of way will begin in 2011, four years sooner and construction will begin in 2014, three years sooner.

Wilmington US 17 Bypass:

Part B (US 74/76 to US 421) – All grading and structures work will be consolidated into one contract in 2013. Paving work will be done under a separate contract in 2017, completing the overall project in 2018, two years sooner.

 

Medicaid initiative saves money

Fullscreen capture 3102011 100026 AM.jpgAn N.C. Medicaid initiative to better manage utilization of prescription pain relievers and other powerful drugs has produced significant savings and improvements in quality of care.

Only a few months old, the controlled substances “lock-in” program limits Medicaid recipients who have a medical need for those drugs to a single prescriber and to a single pharmacy. The heightened tracking that results helps ensure Medicaid recipients are receiving appropriate treatment, and in appropriate amounts. Around 950 of 3,000 eligible N.C. Medicaid recipients are currently “locked in.” Early analyses show the lock-in program could reduce Medicaid expenditures by $9 million annually — $3 million of which would be state tax dollars.

The lock-in serves as part of Governor Bev Perdue’s strategy to reduce waste, fraud and abuse in the Medicaid system.

“This is a perfect example of my priority of setting government straight,” Gov. Perdue said. “We’re providing better health care and saving taxpayer dollars.”

Governor’s schedule for the week

Monday, March 14

Office time, Raleigh

Visit Eaton Corporation, Arden

Speak to Governor’s Conference on Hospitality and Tourism, Asheville

Tuesday, March 15

Legislative meetings, Raleigh

Staff meetings, Raleigh

Press conference, Raleigh

Wednesday, March 15

Legislative meetings, Raleigh

Office time, Raleigh

Thursday, March 16

Office time, Raleigh

Sign proclamation for Wilmington’s Azalea Festival and greet Azalea Queen and Court at the Executive Mansion

Visit Northeast N.C.

Friday, March 17

Conference Call with weekly papers

Email from Sen. Hagan on Financial Regulatory Reform

March 10, 2011

Dear Friend,

Thank you for contacting me regarding financial regulatory reform. I appreciate hearing your thoughts on this important issue. I greatly apologize for my delayed response.

The Restoring American Financial Stability Act of 2010 (H.R. 4173) passed in the House of Representatives on June 30, 2010 and in the Senate on July 15, 2010. It became law on July 21, 2010. The bill reforms the current financial regulatory structure into a more stable and transparent system that will protect consumers, provide clear and fair regulations for financial firms, and restore confidence in the financial markets.

The legislation creates a Systemic Risk Council and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). The Systemic Risk Council will promote market discipline by identifying risks to stability in the financial market, including the ability to authorize the Federal Reserve to break up banks that threaten the stability of our financial system. The CFPB will enforce consumer protection regulations for banks, mortgage-related businesses, payday lenders and other non-bank financial institutions with more than $10 billion dollars in assets. The CFPB will also have the authority to write rules related to consumer financial products such as mortgages, credit cards, and stock options. In addition, the bill eliminates the risky trading that banks engage in, called proprietary trading, and authorizes the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) to oversee the liquidation of failing non-banks that pose a risk to the financial system.

The financial crisis exposed critical gaps and weaknesses in our financial regulatory system. Massive risks in financial markets went undetected by both regulators and market participants. Even if those risks had been exposed earlier, regulators lacked the power to mount an effective response. These systematic failures caused a dramatic loss of confidence in our financial institutions and helped to cause the worst downturn since the Great Depression. Congress had to take action to ensure that American taxpayers will never again have to bail out our financial institutions and that these institutions treat consumers fairly and responsibly.

I supported this legislation because it embodies common sense financial reform that protects consumers, levels the playing field for community banks and provides fair and clear regulations for all financial institutions. North Carolina is a leader in the banking industry, and both our state’s banks and its banking customers will benefit from the financial reforms found in the law. The law will close gaps and eradicate inefficiencies in America’s current regulatory structure. I am proud to represent North Carolina in supporting legislation that works to ensure that American taxpayers will never again have to bear the cost of a financial crisis.

Again, thank you for contacting my office. It is truly an honor to represent North Carolina in the United States Senate, and I hope you will not hesitate to contact me in the future should you have any further questions or concerns.

Sincerely,

Signature

Kay R. Hagan

Walter Jones Requesting Your Input on Federal Reserve System

Dear Friend,

In this Congress, I serve as Vice Chairman of the Domestic Monetary Policy Subcommittee in the House of Representatives. Our oversight responsibilities include reviewing the activities of the Federal Reserve System.

 

Next Thursday, March 17th, the Domestic Monetary Policy Subcommittee will hold a hearing at 10AM on the topic of Monetary Policy and Rising Prices. The three witnesses currently scheduled to testify are:

 

Prof. Joe Salerno, Pace University – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Salerno
Jim Grant, Grant’s Interest Rate Observer – http://www.grantspub.com/
Lewis Lehrman, investment banker and former member of President Reagan’s Gold Commission – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lewis_Lehrman

 

As you know, the Federal Reserve has been printing massive amounts of money as part of a policy they call “Quantitative Easing”. By June, the Fed will have printed roughly $2 trillion over the last two years. The Fed’s money printing is driving up prices for gas, groceries and bills of all kinds for businesses and working families. I strongly disagree with the Fed’s policy; printing money to drive up prices is hurting consumers, and it’s no way to create jobs.

 

This is why I want to hear from you. I would love it if you would provide me with examples of what you see happening with your bills in the real world, so that I can share them with the committee. Also, if you have ideas for specific questions you would like me to pose to the witnesses, I would love those as well.

 

Prior to the last Subcommittee hearing over a thousand people wrote me with questions, and I was able to use many of them over the course of the hearing. While time did not allow me to use all of the questions, or to relay all of the personal stories that people shared, my staff and I read every single one and their sentiments were shared with committee staff and officials.

If you have a moment, please email me through my website with your thoughts and questions for the witnesses at next week’s hearing. Please do not reply to this email, as my website is the best way for me to receive email from Eastern North Carolinians. Thanks in advance for your help. I look forward to hearing from you.

Sincerely,

J

Walter B. Jones
Member of Congress (NC-03)

Email from Congressman Walter Jones re. Federal Agencies abusing regulatory process

Dear Mr. Lang:

Thank you for contacting me to share your concerns regarding federal agencies subverting the will of Congress.  I appreciate you taking the time to contact me and I’m honored to respond.

I agree with your concerns and continue to be troubled by the rise in federal agencies issuing rules/regulations with no jurisdiction to do so, including the two that you mentioned in your letter.  As you know, when the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) issued its “Net Neutrality” regulations, it did so without any authority from the Congress.  Just last month I voted for an amendment to prevent the FCC from implementing any “Net Neutrality” regulations because I believe that the FCC’s actions were a huge overreach.  I am also adamantly opposed to the Environmental Protection Agency’s politically biased rules and regulations, such as the greenhouse gas regulations, and have, and will continue to, support all initiatives to reverse these overreaches.  You will also be happy to learn that I am a cosponsor of H.R. 10, the REINS Act (Regulations From the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act) which would require the Congress to affirmatively approve every new major rule proposed by the Executive Branch before it can be enforced on the American people.

Again, thanks for sharing your thoughts with me.  Please know that I will continue to stand up for the power of the Congress and against overreaches of federal agencies.  If I may be of any further assistance please feel free to contact my office.


Sincerely,

Walter B. Jones
Member of Congress