Category Archives: Front Page

A Brief Recap of the regularly scheduled Morehead City CCTPP Meeting of April 1, 2014: Part 3 of 3 (Taylor Griffin)

The Morehead City faction of the Crystal Coast Tea Party Patriots held their regular weekly meeting Tuesday evening.  The agenda was packed, and the meeting room was near full with a couple of dozen members in attendance, all of whom were attentive to each of the scheduled speakers.  Since there was considerable interlocution with all three candidates for office during the meeting, this recapitulation will be broken into three posts, one each to address the policies and performance of each candidate.  

Third up was Taylor Griffin, who is also, like Al Novenic, a third candidate and a second challenger for North Carolina’s 3rd District Congressional seat currently held by Representative Walter Jones.  Griffin presented no prepared remarks, as this was his third appearance before a meeting of the CCTPP, and he is already known to the members as a man who presents as a more consistently conservative candidate than incumbent Jones.  In his previous visits, he has stated his support for and his belief in a smaller government, less federal spending, small business and the free market, tax simplification with lower marginal rates, defeating the liberal assaults on the Second Amendment, a strong military, and a cautious and piecemeal approach to the problem of illegal immigration, an approach that leaves no room whatsoever for a blanket amnesty.

This appearance was for the purpose of addressing any and all questions that the attending members might have about him, his experience in Washington, his associations, and his policy positions and prescriptions.  The following summarizes the questions asked and the responses given, in no particular order.

On the list of the usual suspects was the subject of ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION.  Griffin admits that it is a sticky issue, as there is a genuine need for the type of low skilled, low paid labor that illegal immigrants are thought to satisfy, including many jobs in NC’s agricultural sector and elsewhere.  A related problem is that, in exchange for any proposals the Republicans might offer to improve border security or to otherwise dis-incentivize more illegal immigration, the Democrats in Congress will demand a pathway to citizenship for those illegals already in the country.

Candidate Griffin believes that a pathway to citizenship would likely result in Democratic electoral majorities for decades to come, and that conservatives must not allow the amnesty / pathway scenario to further advance in Congress.  The most realistic approach for Republicans, he asserts, must be to:

1]  Secure the border by a combination of high-tech methods and equipment coupled with Border Patrol boots on the ground.  This will not be easy, and there will be funding issues, but it is vital.

2]  Strengthen the E-Verify system and it’s participation rate by making it easier for small employers to use, and by enforcing the penalties against those employers who willfully avoid it’s use.

3]  Reduce the dis-incentives to work in our current unemployment benefit and welfare benefit structure.

Griffin was also asked to elaborate on his RELEVANT EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS, so:

1]  he began by confirming that, after college (at Appalachian State) he had worked first in the office of NC Senator Jesse Helms, then in the administration of President George W. Bush in the White House and later in the Treasury Department.  While at Treasury, he also spent time working on developing measures to track and disrupt terrorist funding sources.

2]  In 2008 he moved on to work with the campaign staff for Senator John McCain’s bid for the presidency.  Soon after Alaska Governor Sarah Palin was named as McCain’s VP pick, Griffin was one of the staffers assigned to the tasks of helping Governor Palin deal with the media and fend off the efforts of her adversaries in Alaska to bring her to heel by means of frivolous lawsuits.

3]  In 2010 he co-founded Hamilton Place Strategies (HPS), a public policy consulting firm in Washington, DC.  HPS was a small business which eventually grew to having about twenty employees and a payroll to match.  After selling his share in the firm, he moved back to North Carolina, and now lives in New Bern.

4]  In a follow-up query, Griffin was asked about whether he had ever been a lobbyist.  Griffin said he had not, and that he thinks that rumor may have gotten started because, back in 2010, on behalf of Hamilton Place Strategies, he had filled out the registration form that the Federal government requires of lobbyists.  He had done so out of caution, just in case the Feds were to misconstrue any of his consulting activities to be lobbying.  The firm, he says, never earned a dime for any lobbying activities.

The next question related to Griffin’s views on recent INSIDER TRADING scandals, to which he replied that he thought the laws against it should be made stronger by amending the STOCK Act of 2012 to address the problem of short sales by members of Congress, to expand the disclosure requirements, and to make the penalties for shadow trading more serious.

About his view on TAX REFORM, Griffin said that he favors a simplified tax structure that does not distort the economy in the way that ethanol subsidies and most other green energy preferences do.  He also advocates for lower marginal rates, both for individuals and corporations, and for policies that could entice corporations to bring their monetary profits and reserves back into the U.S. where they could be available to help capitalize our economy.

On his SUPPORT FOR THE MILITARY, he promised to equal or exceed the support attributed to Representative Walter Jones on military issues, and even drew the questioner’s attention to an instance in which Jones’ voting had been inconsistent with his rhetoric on the issue.

On FOREIGN AID, candidate Griffin believes that there is some room for cuts to the foreign aid budget, but since expenditures are only $37-billion out of a budget in excess of $3,400-billion, it is not our most pressing fiscal problem.  He added, however, that he was, unlike President Obama, a strong supporter of Israel and would usually be in their corner when it came to dealing with the Palestinians and other adversaries in the Middle East.  Moreover, he thinks that the Israel portion of our foreign aid budget is justified.

Asked about his view of the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) regulatory activism during the Obama administration, Griffin stated that he opposes much of their agenda, particularly their regulations dealing with carbon (cap-&-trade) and carbon gases (carbon dioxide), and would work to constrain the agency’s regulatory excesses.

Asked also about his view of certain NSA activities authorized under the Patriot Act, Griffin affirmed that it is necessary for the Feds to have access to telecommunication meta-data in order to thwart or pursue terrorists, but that the government need not have custody of the records.  Also, he thinks it imperative that there be independent oversight of the NSA’s access to the data.

Chairman Bob Cavanaugh asked Griffin what COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS he would pursue if elected, and Griffin responded that he would most want to be on the House Armed Services and Marine Fisheries committees.

For additional information, readers may wish to visit Taylor Griffin’s website, HERE.

Is Mark Harris Gaining Ground with the Tea Party?

On March 13, Mark Harris spoke before the Carteret County Republican Men’s Club to pitch his suitability to be the new junior Senator from North Carolina.  I was in attendance, and posted THIS account the next day briefly outlining my favorable impression of him.  Also, about three weeks ago I posted THIS link to the lengthy interview that Brant Clifton (of The Daily Haymaker) did with Mark Harris.

Earlier this week, the Republican NC-GOP Senate hopeful appeared before the Caldwell County Tea Party to present his case to them.  He won a great many of them over, apparently, but you can judge the tone of the News-Topic article, HERE, for yourself.

Greg Brannon Is Still Giving It His Best Effort

In spite of the negative publicity associated with the recent civil trail verdict against him, Republican NC-GOP primary candidate Dr. Greg Brannon of Cary is still in there pitching.  Underscoring his continuing committment to the challenge of winning the Senate seat held at present by Kay Hagan, Dr. Brannon gave THIS revealing interview to AP reporter Gary Robertson earlier this week.  A comprehensive article, and worth reading.

The only leading candidate for the GOP Senate primary nomination that has not been seen yet in Carteret County is Heather Grant, a medical professional from Wilkesboro who describes herself as being more in accord with Greg Brannon’s views than any of the other primary candidates.  We will have an opportunity to hear from her at the Crystal Coast Republican Men’s Club meeting of April 10th.  Check the Events List on the right sidebar of the Home page for details, and click HERE to read a recent article on Mrs. Grant from WRAL.com.  And for much more on her, go to her website, HERE.

A Brief Recap of the regularly scheduled Morehead City CCTPP Meeting of April 1, 2014: Part 2 of 3 (Blake Beadle)

The Morehead City faction of the Crystal Coast Tea Party Patriots held their regular weekly meeting Tuesday evening.  The agenda was packed, and the meeting room was near full with a couple of dozen members in attendance, all of whom were attentive to each of the scheduled speakers.  Since there was considerable interlocution with all three candidates for office during the meeting, this recapitulation will be broken into three posts, one each to address the policies and performance of each candidate.  

Second up was Blake Beadle, one of the three Republican candidates for the Carteret County Board of Education seat given up by Vice Chairwoman Cathy Neagle.  (We have heard already from fellow Republican candidate Randy Steele, and we are scheduled to have the third Republican candidate, Janiece Wall, return to our meeting next week on April 8th.)  Mr. Beadle grew up in Hubert, just west of Swansboro, and attended school there.  He graduated from high school in Maryland, then furthered his education at Cape Fear Community College and UNC-Wilmington.  He graduated from UNC-W after meeting his future wife, Millie Grady, who is a native of Carteret County.  He later worked in Washington, DC, for a time before moving back to Carteret County.

Mr. Beadle began his prepared remarks by noting that North Carolina ranks 46th in the nation in teacher pay, from which I infer that he believes some redress is in order.  He went on to talk about some of his special interests as regards the county’s BOE fiscal policies, including his interest in leasing rather than purchasing of some durable equipment, and the development of Key Performance Indicators (KPI) to enable cost savings in the portion of the system budget that is not allocated to teacher remuneration.

He supports the eventual elimination of teacher tenure, but thinks that greater financial incentives should be offered to teachers in order to compensate them for giving it up.  He supports vouchers, charter schools, and home schooling as alternatives to the status quo.  He describes himself as being conflicted on the issue of Common Core, as he thinks the adoption of national standards will help students, now and in the future, by enabling them to better cope with the increased mobility that our population is experiencing.  He notes, however, that there are drawbacks to Common Core, and in his view the undesirable curriculum controls and dictates for the Math and Language Arts subjects are foremost among them.

Mr. Beadle also promised that, if elected, some portion of his compensation for serving on the Board would be devoted to establishing three High School level scholarships in the County for the promotion of learning in the vocational, educational, and culinary fields.  For further information, readers are encouraged to visit Mr. Beadle’s “Blake For Education” website, HERE.

Were Our Efforts For Naught? Maybe Not!

PowerLine Co-blogger Paul Mirengoff notes today that the volume of comments in opposition to the proposed IRS regulatory constraints on organizations that have or sought tax-exempt status under Section 501(c)(4) have forced a reconsideration.  An excerpt:

I don’t know whether the criticisms have been heard by the IRS but their weight has been felt.  Today IRS Commissioner Koskinen told an audience at the National Press Club that his agency is unlikely to finalize the proposed regulations this year.

Koskinen said:

During the comment period, which ended in February, we received more than 150,000 comments.  That’s a record for an IRS rulemaking comment period.  In fact, if you take all the comments on all Treasury and IRS draft proposals over the last seven years and double that number, you come close to the number of comments we are now beginning to review and analyze.

It’s going to take us a while to sort through all those comments, hold a public hearing, possibly repropose a draft regulation and get more public comments.  This means that it is unlikely we will be able to complete this process before the end of the year.

Great news, if true, because putting off the implementation of the proposal until next year means that there is a greater probability that a larger Republican presence in Congress might kill them altogether.

We should all recognize that this result is largely due to the efforts of Washington DC attorney Cleta Mitchell, and to all the conservative and Tea Party groups around the country that raised such holy hell about the proposal.  Including us, the Crystal Coast Tea Party Patriots.

Sec’y of State Kerry Gets No Love From the Palestinians

It seems that the foolish Obama/Kerry gambit to bring peace to the Middle East has gone down in flames, preventing the further consideration, fortunately, of an even more foolish offer to release Israeli spy Jonathan Pollard in an attempt to entice the Netanyahu government into rolling over and exposing their under-belly to the Palestinians.

At the online New York Post, John Podhoretz has up an opinion piece about the debacle.  From the article, this key portion:

On Tuesday, the Palestinians took eight months of relentless work by Kerry and threw it in the garbage.  Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas announced he will seek membership for “Palestine” in various international forums and treaties as the equivalent of a sovereign nation.

That move violates the central concept of the so-called “two-state solution,” according to which the Israelis and Palestinians need to come to mutual agreement on the borders of a Palestinian state.

In response, Kerry canceled his bazillionth trip to the region.  And yet he couldn’t admit what the cancellation implicitly acknowledged.

“It is completely premature tonight to draw any kind of judgment, certainly any final judgment,” Kerry said.  “The important thing is to keep the process moving and find a way to see whether the parties are prepared to move forward.”

To borrow one of President Obama’s favorite expressions, let’s be clear:  the Palestinians do not really want peace.  The Palestinians do not REALLY WANT peace.  The Palestinians DO NOT REALLY WANT PEACE.  So why don’t we just quit wasting our time with this b/s, already?

It has been said before that by the time Obama leaves office the perception that his presidency was as inept as was Jimmy Carter’s will be seen as a “best case” scenario.  This episode will only fuel that flame.  

For the full article, click HERE.

A Brief Recap of the regularly scheduled Morehead City CCTPP Meeting of April 1, 2014: Part 1 of 3 (Al Novenic)

The Morehead City faction of the Crystal Coast Tea Party Patriots held their regular meeting last night.  The agenda was packed, and the meeting room was near full with a couple of dozen members in attendance, all of whom were attentive to each of the scheduled speakers.  Since there was considerable interlocution with all three candidates for office during the meeting, this recapitulation will be broken into three posts, one each to address the policies and performance of each candidate.  

First up was Al Novenic, the third candidate and the second challenger for North Carolina’s 3rd District Congressional seat currently held by Representative Walter Jones.  Mr. Novenic, also known by the nickname “Big Al” (website with several position papers and videos is HERE), is a retired Marine First Sergeant who currently has a real estate operation in the Jacksonville area.  His wife Tina came with him, and assisted his presentation by disseminating a few hand-outs to the members.

Mr. Novenic is a strong speaker with a notably forthright presence, and he did not hesitate to answer all of the questions put to him during the meeting.  Indeed, he and his wife stayed to the end of the meeting in order to discuss his views with interested members.

He characterized himself as a strong supporter of the Second Amendment, and as to the nation’s economy, he favors a flatter tax structure (with a maximum rate of maybe 15%) that would shift business-friendly tax policies away from large corporations and toward small business.  He believes that the federal budget could be significantly reduced if the tax code were to be scrutinized for unjustifiable loopholes, and if our welfare entitlement system was reformed to reduce or eliminate many of the more abused elements.

As a realtor, he strongly favors proactive measures to shore up the housing market, saying that the housing sector is “the number one job creator in the country.”  In addition, when asked what congressional committee assignments he would pursue if elected, he named the Armed Services Committee, the Marine Fisheries Committee, and the Agriculture Committee.

As noted in the preceding paragraph, Novenic has numerous policy position papers, essays, and videos on his website that further detail his views, and I would urge interested viewers to check out the site.  The link is in the second paragraph, above, and HERE.

NC-BOE Finds 35,000 Incidences of 2012 Double-Voting

Seems that Jay Delancy is definitely on to something.  Here is the complete text of Andrew Johnson’s article at the online National Review:

North Carolina’s Board of Elections found that tens of thousands of registered voters from the state have personal information matching that of registered voters in other states, and appear to have voted in states other than North Carolina in 2012.  In some cases, votes were cast under names of individuals who had passed away before Election Day.

The review searched databases in 27 other states and 101 million voter records for information such as matching names, dates of birth, and Social Security numbers.

The review found that 35,570 North Carolina voters from 2012 shared the same first names, last names, and dates of birth with individuals who voted in other states.  Another 765 Tar Heel State residents who voted in 2012 had the the same names, birthdays, and final four digits of a Social Security number as voters elsewhere.

Meanwhile, the election board’s executive director, Kim Westbrook, told lawmakers that 81 deceased North Carolinians apparently voted in 2012 as well.  While some appear to have submitted absentee ballots prior to their death, she said “there are between 40 and 50 who had died at a time that that’s not possible.”

Westbrook offered a series of proposals for the state to consider to better secure its voting practices and reduce fraud, including on-site digital face-recognition or electronic-signature technology.

For more detail, also check out THIS article from WRAL.com, in Raleigh.

A Busy CCTPP Meeting Set For Tuesday Night

As can be seen on the Events List (at right in the sidebar), our next BlakeBeadle2regularly scheduled meeting is Tuesday evening at the Golden Corral in Morehead City.  We are scheduled to have the following speakers:

Blake Beadle (at right) is the candidate running for the Carteret County Board of Education seat vacated by Mike Mansfield, as Mansfield is now running for County Commissioner.

Al Novinec (at left, below) is the third candidate in the primary race to be the Republican nominee for the North Carolina 3rd BigAl_NovinecCongressional District seat in congress.  The other two are the incumbent, Walter Jones, and Taylor Griffin.

Taylor Griffin (not pictured) is also scheduled to be at the meeting, not so much to speak, but since the primary is only five weeks hence, to answer any lingering questions that our attendees may have on his policy positions or his ideological philosophy.

As an additional attraction, the Golden Corral will prepare, as a one-time special treat not seen on their regular menu, the delicious Haggis Hoagie with Iguana Liver Pate’.  Don’t miss it!

An NRA for Ka-nife Owners

I welcome this development and have for a long time, ever since Mrs. Saunders confiscated my high-quality German-made switchblade in the seventh grade.  Darned ole’ busybody.  I paid five bucks for that knife, and it was the envy of every other boy on the schoolyard.

Below is the full text from the article that appeared on Brietbart:

With gun control defeated in 2013 and unlikely to make any headway with the 2014 elections, forcing Democrats to tack to the center, many citizens are lining up to push back laws restricting knife ownership.

The battle is being led by Knife Rights, an organization Doug Ritter founded in 2006 after realizing “there was not an NRA for knife owners.”

According to KnifeRights.org, Ritter has already succeeded in seeing “knife preemption laws” enacted in Arizona, Utah, New Hampshire, Georgia, Kansas, and Alaska.

Moreover, the National Journal reports that a knife bill which repeals the carrying and sale of switchblade knives has been passed in Tennessee, and Governor Bill Haslam (R) is expected to sign it.

The bill repeals the state’s ban on switchblade knives and the 4-inch blade limit heretofore placed on knives carried by those “with intent to go armed.”  The legislation “also preempts any city or town ordinance that regulates knives.”

NRA executive vice president Wayne LaPierre fully supports the work of Knife Rights, calling them “the premier grassroots organization protecting our right to own knives.”  He adds: “Those who love freedom need Knife Rights.”

And yes, there is a Second Amendment issue here.  After all, the one-armed, gun averse folks among us have the right to concealed carry also, don’t they?

SWAT Team Raids Suburban Family Home Over Teenager’s Science Project

On the morning of April 20, 2012, Bob Harte woke up to pounding at his door.  He answered the door to find a fully-armed team of SWAT officers from the Sheriff’s Office in Johnson County, Kansas. The officers pushed CopsAbusePowerHarte to the floor of his home, then gathered his wife, his 13yo son, and his 7yo daughter together and sat them on the living room couch before commencing a two-hour raid of the residence, all the while with cop cars and flashing blue lights filling his yard and rousing his community.

The deputies refused to tell Harte why they were searching his home until they had completed the raid, but as they were leaving they told him they were searching for narcotics. They found none, and left him a receipt stating that there were “No items taken.”  In order to allay the natural suspicions of his neighbors at seeing a SWAT team raid on his home, Bob Harte had to take this receipt around to show his neighbors in order to prove that he and his family were not criminals.

The Harte’s, two former CIA employees with no criminal records, wanted to know how they had been selected for the raid, but the County officials would not tell them.  So they filed suit, eventually spending $25,000 dollars to find out, because they felt, as I do, as you would, that the public has an interest in knowing whether law enforcement raids of residential properties are based on a well-founded allegation of wrong-doing, validated by the careful scrutiny of the magistrates or judges who sign the authorizing warrants.

For more on this episode and it’s aftermath, check out THIS article at Yahoo News, and THIS article from local Kansas City television station KSHB (which includes a video), and THIS article from Opposing Views, an independent media site based in Los Angeles.

My purpose in posting about such occurances as this one is that I think that law enforcement in the United States is becoming too militarized, and that magistrates and judges are all too often derelict in their duty to clearly identify a legitimate “probable cause” before signing warrants for searches, particularly of residential properties.  However, I also acknowledge that LEO’s have a vested interest in trying to employ overwhelming force when they have a realistic expectation of armed resistance.  So, HERE is another perspective, more fair and balanced.

Really? A “Profile In Courage” or an “Act Of Betrayal”?

Former President George Hiram Walker Bush (Bush-41) is being given a Profile In Courage Award by the JFK Presidential Library Foundation for his capitulation to the Democrats in the 1990 Congress, in which he agreed to raising tax rates as a part of that year’s budget deal.  There are at least two things about this that are of note:

  1. The first is the irony of being given an award for raising taxes by the Presidential Library Foundation of the President that urged onto Congress the largest reduction in marginal income tax rates in the last half-century.
  2. The second is that Bush-41’s son George W. Bush, who became President in his own right (Bush-43) has acknowledged his opinion, to many of his friends in private, that the single biggest factor in the failure of his father to win re-election against Bill Clinton in 1992 was his father’s betrayal of his “read my lips, no new taxes” pledge during the 1988 campaign, in which he won over Democratic candidate Michael Dukakis.

The full story, from USA-Today, is HERE.

Democrat Intransigence on the Proposed IRS Regs: Were Our Efforts For Naught?

President Obama wants increased funding for the International Obama_HammerMonetary Fund (IMF), and the Senate wants to give it to him.  And at first blush, it seems like a straightforward and uncomplicated proposition, as reflected in this excerpt from Thursday’s post at CNN’s Money blog:

The International Monetary Fund [IMF] has agreed to lend Ukraine up to $18 billion over the next two years as its new government tries to stave off economic collapse.  Kiev has been running dangerously low on cash to pay for imports and service its debts since the ousting of pro-Moscow former President Vitkor Yanukovych last month, which killed off a $15 billion financial lifeline from Russia.

and

“The IMF package should be sufficient to prevent the country falling into a full-blown balance of payments crisis, in which the hrvynia would drop sharply and output would collapse,” said William Jackson, emerging market economist at Capital Economics.  In return for the bailout, Ukraine will implement a program of unpopular reforms aimed at stabilizing the economy and creating the conditions for a return to sustained growth.  Central to the program are commitments by Ukraine to tackle corruption — a major concern of international lenders — and reforming the country’s energy market, including the gradual withdrawal of subsidies on natural gas.

But with 100,000 Russian troops poised at the border, things are getting more complicated.  On top of that, the House Republicans, who are reluctant to bless the IMF expansions that the President favors, want a quid pro quo.  They have agreed to pass the IMF funding bill, which will enable the IMF to prevent chaos in the Ukrainian monetary system, in return for the Obama administrations’s promise to back off on implementation of the new IRS regulations that would restrict the political activism of the many conservative organizations that fall under the IRS Section 501(c)(4) rules for non-profits.

So, does Boehner have a deal?  Nope, nada, no way, Jose.  As reported earlier this week by Eliana Johnson at the online National Review (with my slight editing for brevity):

In the ongoing negotiations over a bill to fund aid to Ukraine, Republicans in both chambers told Democrats privately that they would cede ground on the IMF provision — which gives more influence within the organization to developing countries and, Republicans say, diminishes that of the United States — if Democrats agreed to delay the proposed rules.

and

Democrats wanted approval for new IMF rules and more funding for the president’s pre-kindergarten program, among other things, but were unwilling to give in on the IRS regulations: Democrats and the administration rejected [the] offer to trade increased funding for the IMF for an amendment that would have delayed them.  “The spin is that Republicans are so petty, but the truth is that Democrats are willing to sacrifice everything, including the IMF reforms they wanted, to keep them,” says a senior Republican aide.

For more, check out THIS at CNN, and THIS at National Review.

Hobby Lobby, in the Eye of the ObamaCare Hurricane

Until this past week, I had never set foot in a Hobby Lobby store, and the first impression I had when I entered the Morehead City store was that it was enormous.  It was also not what I expected.  There were no lavish ObamacarePost_HeaderImagedisplays of model electric trains, no section for battery powered remote-controlled model dune buggies, model boats, model airplanes, helicopters, or quadrocopters, not even a telescope for a harmless bit of stargazing.

But there was other stuff, lots of other stuff.  The second thing I noticed after walking in was, off to my right, a very large area devoted to the display of artificial flowers.  Being in firm possession of a Y chromosome, I do not have much interest in flowers, artificial or otherwise, so I moved on.  I saw sewing and knitting supplies, picture framing materials, art supplies, even some ready-made doll houses, and as I continued wandering about the store, my amazement grew at what I would characterize as the largest inventory of household knick-knacks in the universe.  And yes, there were some religious items, but not significantly more than you would find at a Target or Wal-Mart, in my opinion.

I went to the store in order to learn a little about the nature of the retail chain that has become the center of a controversial case that was argued just this past week in front of the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS).  The case is Sebelius versus Hobby Lobby Stores, and in combination with the similar Conestoga Wood Specialties versus Sebelius suit, it presented to the Justices the question of whether a business can be forced by the government to provide health insurance coverage to it’s employees when that coverage will encompass goods and/or services to which the business ownership objects on religious grounds.  In this case the objectional “goods and/or services” are contraceptives, which are mandated by ObamaCare.

Based on how most Court observers assess the arguments, the ruling on this case (expected in June) will be decided on a 5/4 split with Justice Kennedy as the swing vote.  No one knows which arguments the Court will find more persuasive, but for more information and detail, check out these links to three articles reporting on the oral arguments before the Court last Tuesday.  The first, HERE, is a recap from SCOTUSBlog legal journalist Lyle Denniston.  The second, HERE, is from Sarah Torre posting in a Q-&-A format at the online National Review, and the third, HERE, is a posting by law professor Eugene Volokh in which he presents a technical analysis of the core arguments in the case.

I’m rooting for the conservative side to prevail, for two reasons.  First, because it would be the right outcome on constitutional grounds, and second, because it would be another serious wound for the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

Admiral Jeremiah Denton is Dead at 89

Years ago I read “When Hell Was In Session”, retired Navy Admiral Jeremiah Denton’s account of his seven and a half year residency at the Hanoi Hilton and other prisons maintained by the North Vietnamese for captured American air crew members.  As a Navy Captain, he was often the ranking officer.  Aside from being one of the prisoners held longest by the North Vietnamese, Admiral Denton also achieved a measure of fame when he blinked his eyes during a propaganda interview to spell out, in Morse Code, the word “TORTURE”.

There are many remembrances of him in the media today, but THIS one actually contains video of the Admiral blinking the code.

Can We Follow In Indiana’s Footsteps?

In the presentations that I have attended where the subject of Common Core arose, there have been conflicting opinions as to whether North EndCommonCore_LogoCarolina would be required to refund to the federal government all the money received as incentives for the adoption and implementation of Common Core in our State, were we to abandon Common Core altogether.

In a new Common Core development reported by Alec Torres at the online National Review, Indiana’s Republican Governor Mike Pence has signed a bill withdrawing the State from the Common Core program.  An excerpt:

At first, the initiative seemed full of promise; it was little-known and seldom critiqued outside of education-policy circles.  In Indiana, the effort to implement the Common Core was spearheaded by Republican governor Mitch Daniels and his fellow Republican Tony Bennett, the superintendent of public instruction, with the support of Democrats and Republicans alike.  In August 2010, only two months after the final standards were made public, Daniels touted the Common Core as a simplification of the state standards that had previously been in place, and the state board of education voted unanimously to join.  Implementation began the next school year.  Only four states — Alaska, Nebraska, Texas, and Virginia — refused to adhere to the new standards.

Even in the full article, HERE, no mention is made of Indiana having to pay back any funding, and I think such an expensive consequence would have been mentioned.  So, can we follow Indiana’s lead?  The NC General Assembly is studying the issue even now, and I hope their conclusion can be in the affirmative.

For some background on Common Core, check out THIS article from the North Carolina Institute for Constitutional Law.

Professor Willingham and College Football Player Unions

A couple of months ago I put up a short post, HERE, about UNC academic advisor Mary Willingham’s efforts to expose the sham of athlete academic performance in the UNC system, particularly UNC-CH.  Now, Professor Willingham’s allegations are back in the news after having been authenticated by the recent statements in HBO and ESPN interviews of former UNC-CH football players Deunta Williams, Michael McAdoo, and Bryon Bishop.  Just to illustrate how abysmally poor the academic abilities of some UNC athletes are, the graphic below (which I have reformatted to better fit this post) is an essay written by one of them to satisfy an assignment in a UNC-CH African-American Studies class:

RosaParksStory

Lest you think this is an excerpt, it is not.  That’s it.  That’s the entire essay.  Now make sure you are sitting down when I reveal to you that the paper was graded, according to ESPN, as an A-minus paper.

So, what connection is there between this and the recent proposals to allow college athletic teams to unionize?  Well, first, the foregoing part of this post graphically illustrates that many college athletes are not students in any serious sense, but rather employees of the school’s athletics department.  The unionization movement, therefore, simply reflects reality.  And, in my view, anything that will expose and highlight this reality can only hasten the process of bursting the higher-education bubble (meaning the “business model” of our university system, the one that makes college so inordinately expensive) in American academe, and that’s a good thing.

Although details are lacking at this point, I think it can be assumed that taxpayers would balk at funding the salaries of unionized college athletes, so the requisite revenue would presumably come from game ticket sales.  That would make even more visible the obvious truth that college athletic programs are a business separate and apart from the delivery of a college education.  Once athletes become paid in a manner commensurate with their value to the athletics program money machine, I don’t think the association could long endure.

For more, check out THIS article on CNN.com,  THIS article at the New-&-Observer, THIS article at Yahoo Sports, and THIS article at The Daily Caller.

Why Is Trouble Still Brewing In The South China Sea?

In another example of an American military leader tacitly acknowledging how the perception of American weakness is inviting foreign adventurism, the Chief of Naval Intelligence for the U.S. Pacific Fleet said this in recent weeks:

… the PLA [the Chinese “Peoples Liberation Army] has been given the new task to be able to conduct a short sharp war to destroy Japanese forces in the East China Sea following with what can only be expected [to be] a seizure of the Senkakus or even a southern Ryukyu [islands] …

And earlier this week, Army General Curtis Scaparrotti, the commander of U.N. and U.S. forces in South Korea, also questioned whether U.S. forces would be able to quickly counter a sudden large-scale offensive in the region, saying this before a Congressional hearing:

“I am concerned about the readiness of the follow-on forces in our theater … Given the indications and warnings and the nature of this theater and the threat that we face, I rely on rapid and ready forces to flow into the peninsula in crisis.”

And also from earlier this week, Admiral Samuel Locklear, commander of the U.S. Navy’s Pacific Command, weighed in:

… the reality is, is that to get Marines around effectively, they require all types of lift.  They require the big amphibious ships, but they also require connectors (meaning landing craft and other amphibious vehicles).  The lift is the enabler that makes that happen, so we wouldn’t be able to [successfully carry out a contested amphibious assault without additional resources] …”

So, why so much concern over what may be brewing in a region surrounding an oceanic basin half a world away?  The answer can be summarized into three basic points of contention, illustrated by this first map of the area, below.  The three points of contention overlap, but can be thought of as first, the maritime claims, meaning the national claims to fishing rights for a body of water; second, the national claims over resources on or beneath the sea-bed, primarily petroleum and natural gas deposits, and; third, rights of navigation.  In today’s world, the claims to fishing rights and sea-bed rights are most often combined under the term Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), which typically extends out to 200 nautical miles (nm) from a national coastline.  In this map, I have used the map scale to superimpose two red arrows that approximate the extent of the 200nm limit, and a red line across the arrow tips to approximate the outer terminus of the zone.

SouthChinaSea_MapAt this point it may be useful to note that the word “boundary” (as in international boundary) refers to a point behind which a nation has complete sovereignty, and such “coastal waters” boundaries extend out to three miles from a shoreline.  Points that go beyond the boundary are referred to as “limits” in order to avoid confusion.  The EEZ terminus is a zonal limit, as is the Territorial Sea (out to 12nm) and the Contiguous Zone (out to 24nm).  A nation may not restrict the international rights of navigation beyond it’s Territorial zone.  Also, a nation generally cannot exceed the other limits noted above except by treaty.

SouthChinaSea_MaritimeClaimsThe most important line on the second map (above) is the red line, as it encompasses the maritime and resource claims of the Peoples Republic of China (China, or PRC), and increasingly, claims to exclusive rights of navigation as well.  Most authorities (and reasonable people) would agree with the posture of the United States on these claims, which is that they are outrageously over-reaching, and a serious threat to peace in the region if and when they are enforced by the Chinese military.

And there have been numerous examples in recent months of such enforcement measures, from Chinese gunboats harassing fishing vessels from Japan, Taiwan, Vietnam, and the Philippines, to Chinese announcements that commercial airliner overflights would require advance permission, to intimidating behavior aimed at U.S. Navy vessels transiting the passage, to renewed territorial claims on islands claimed by Japan and other nations.  Considering that the South China Sea is the second most busy sea lane on the planet, China’s attempts at limiting the rights of navigation there are especially troubling.

All of this combined seems to strongly indicate that China is itching for an armed confrontation in the area.  However, their ambitions are not directed at the United States, but primarily toward Japan, Taiwan, and the Philippines.  In years past, these ambitions have been held in check by the determination of every American president since World War I to preserve, and enforce if necessary, international rights in this critical region.

So, forgive a little metaphor mixing when I ask, does President Obama “walk softly and carry a big stick”?  Or does he just “talk the talk”?  By now, I think Vladimir Putin has clearly figured out the answer to that question, as have the Iranian mullahs, and maybe the Chinese leadership as well.  And, if the Chinese do seize the Senkakus and/or the Ryukyus, and if they are allowed to get away with it, how long before they decide that the time is ripe for a takeover of Taiwan, and then a move on the Japanese home islands?

New Link to the CCTPP E-Mail List Sign-up Form

The website now has a new page entitled GET ON THE CCTPP E-MAIL LIST for readers to use in accessing the sign-up form for the CCTPP E-Mail List maintained by our Communications Committee Chairman, Ken Lang.  To get there, navigate to CONTACTS on our menu bar and look for the page on the drop-down menu.

Before the last wound heals, Paul Ryan shoots himself in the foot again.

My fearless prediction: this guy is never going to be a Republican Illegal_Immigrants_2nominee for the U.S. Presidency so long as he keeps doing stuff like THIS.  Among the Ryan quotes as he spoke before a breakfast hosted by the United States Hispanic Chamber of Commerce:

“To me, it’s not a question of ‘if’ we fix our broken immigration laws, it’s really a question of ‘when.’”

“Please know that we understand the value of immigration.  We know its importance; we know its roots, its history here in America; and we have ideas on how to make this go forward and make it work so that we do have the rule of law, so that we do have reform, so that we’re not in the same position fifteen years down the road.”

Readers may also remember that, in an interview earlier this year with his hometown newspaper (the Janesville, Wisconsin, “Gazette”) Ryan acknowledged that Boehner and company do not yet have the votes to pass an immigration reform bill, but that “we’re working hard to find where that consensus lies.”

Unfortunately, Ryan’s idea of a “fix” seems to include amnesty.  Sigh.

ObamaCare Escape Hatch – Health Care Sharing Ministries

From John Berlau’s article from yesterday at OpenMarkets, the Competitive Enterprise Institute blog:

Buried in Section 1501 on page 148 of the so-called Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is an exemption from the individual mandate for a “health care sharing ministry,” a group whose members “share a common set of ethical or religious beliefs and share medical expenses among members in accordance with those beliefs.”  For any member of such group, the law says, “No penalty shall be imposed.”

Intriguing, no?  Read the whole thing, HERE.

William F. Buckley on Moral Equivalence

Beginning with the 1964 presidential campaign, I became a big fan, so to speak, of William F. Buckley and his political views.  Years later, on the Johnny Carson show of all places, Bill Buckley gave a succinct refutation of the moral equivalence stance taken by so many on the American left, and in general by apologists for the former Soviet Union:

To say that the CIA and the KGB engage in similar practices is the equivalent of saying that the man who pushes an old lady into the path of a hurtling bus is not to be distinguished from the man who pushes an old lady out of the path of a hurtling bus: on the grounds that, after all, in both cases someone is pushing old ladies around.

The statement, of course, is still relevant today.  To see how, just substitute, for the phrase “the CIA and the KGB”, something like “Israel and Al-Qaida”, or “American and Iran”, or numerous other pairings that are often bandied about in the liberal media and on the internet.

Gotta love Buckley.  I miss the guy.

When In San Francisco, Wear Your Pistol To Bed

That wacky 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has again come up with a doozy of a ruling, this time on a Second Amendment case arising out of a San Francisco ordinance that requires gun owners to keep all their firearms either disabled (via use of a trigger lock) or locked in a gun safe EXCEPT WHEN BEING CARRIED ON THEIR PERSON.  The ordinance applies to all residents, even those without children or those living alone.

A key excerpt from the Court’s ruling:

Thus, even when a handgun is secured, it may be readily accessed in case of an emergency.  Further, section 4512 [of the San Francisco ordinance] leaves open alternative channels for self-defense in the home, because San Franciscans are not required to secure their handguns while carrying them on their person.  Provided San Franciscans comply with the storage requirements, they are free to use handguns to defend their home while carrying them on their person.

Yeah, right.  Pajamas with a holster pocket, coming to San Francisco area Wal-Marts soon.  Check out Eugene Volokh’s analysis of the silliness at the Volokh Conspiracy, HERE.

Tonight’s CCTPP Meeting — A Brief Recap

Tonight’s meeting of the Morehead City faction of the Crystal Coast Tea Party Patriots was well attended, with a busy agenda.  First, Chairman Bob Cavanaugh reported on his recent unofficial poll of Tea Party principles in eastern North Carolina, as well as the members in attendance, with the conclusion that most of the support for a Republican primary challenger against Senator Kay Hagan is still with Greg Brannon.  This remains so in spite of the recent developments that would presumably affect his electability, vis-a-vis Kay Hagan, in an adverse and substantive way.

Next, Chairman Cavanaugh announced that Ken Lang has resumed the responsibilities of CCTPP Communications Committee Chairman.  Ken is also the Administrator for the CCTPP Facebook page.  His resumed duties will be to administer the maintenance and use of the CCTPP E-Mail List, and to recruit speakers for the CCTPP meetings as well as the Carteret County Republican Men’s Club meetings.  Anyone interested in being added to the E-Mail List or in speaking before either of the aforementioned groups should contact Ken, and his contact information is on this website under the CONTACTS / CONTACT CCTPP menu bar.

Next, we heard remarks from Willie Montague, a young man from Willie_280WideMorehead City who was an early supporter of what became the Crystal Coast Tea Party Patriots.  Mr. Montague has been living in Broken Arrow, Oklahoma in recent years, but hopes to return to Morehead City as soon as he can find employment here.  He is a minister and an exceptional public speaker, and he also has a business background.  Anyone who thinks they might assist in improving his employment prospects in Carteret County, give him a jingle at 918/625-7783.  Note that this area code is 918, not 919.

In his remarks before the group, Montague made several important points about his is experience as someone who once campaigned in Broken Arrow for a seat in the Oklahoma state House, particularly with respect to what he learned as a black conservative trying to appeal to the black community there.  He was also persuasive in making the point that any effort aimed at bringing about a conversion to conservative principles among black people must arise from within that community.

The group next heard from Randy Feagle, a downeaster running to un-seat Carteret County Commissioner and Commission Chairman Jonathan Robinson.  Mr. Feagle believes that he would be a more responsive Commissioner for District #6, especially with regard to Fire and EMS issues.

Lastly, the group acknowledged, with best wishes, another birthday for Rose Thompson.  Her 29th, we presume!

Don’t Want No Cheese, Lord, Just Lemme Outah Da Trap

One weekend when I was a teenaged college student, I brought home from NCSU (the best college I ever flunked out of) a friend who was a Math major.  My father was still raising a few hogs then, and my friend and I were out in the yard, leaning up against the hog pen, when he idly wondered, “Why do you build the pens in a rectangle?  You know, you could enclose more area with less lumber if you built them round.”  The question took me aback somewhat, and I did not have a good answer, so I paused to give it some thought.  While I was mulling it over my Dad walked up, so I relayed my friend’s question to him.  Dad looked at us both as if we were imbeciles, then stated what he plainly thought was an obvious truth: “Without a corner, there would be no place to hem up a hog if you needed to catch one”.

President Obama clearly wants to “hem up” everyone who might have an ObamacarePost_HeaderImagealternative to becoming enrolled in ObamaCare.  Ed Haislmaier is a senior research fellow in the Heritage Foundation’s Center for Health Policy Studies, and late last week he posted an article at the online National Review about the latest “executive order” that is intended to tighten the ObamaCare noose.  It focuses on “indemnity insurance”, and the full article is HERE.

Immigrants March for North Carolina Drivers Licenses

Most of us remember how it was in a typical North Carolina DMV office Illegal_Immigrants_2before the state stopped issuing Drivers Licenses to illegal immigrants.  I do, rather clearly.  I was living in Wake County near a DMV office at the time, and the line was out the door with lots of people who looked decidedly Hispanic.  After the law was changed, the hordes evaporated almost overnight.

Now the illegals are becoming bolder.  The text below is presented in its entirety from a Saturday article (with the same title) on WRAL.com:

Immigrant families and their supporters marched through downtown Raleigh Saturday in hopes of being able to drive in North Carolina.

About 100 people who support driver’s licenses for immigrants living illegally in North Carolina marched down Fayetteville Street to the Governor’s Mansion.

“I’m afraid that I could get stopped and not really know what’s going to happen next.  I may be sent back to where I came from, Mexico, or go to jail and pay a heavy fine,” said Rafael Mendiola, who attended Saturday’s protest.

A recently released study by the state Department of Public Safety concluded that giving driving permits to immigrants in the state illegally should lead to safer driving, although there’s no established statistical basis to verify that conclusion.

The study also listed the downsides to issuing the licenses, including more resources needed for the Division of Motor Vehicles and the influx of applicants, many of whom may not pass the exam.

An “influx of applicants”?  Ya think?

We Stole It Fair And Square, Then Carter Gave It Away

In a few years, it will have been forty years since President Jimmy Carter signed the treaty giving the Panama Canal back to the Panamanians.  Since then, the Panamanian canal management authority has undertaken a massive modernization and expansion project, and by the fortieth anniversary of the treaty, the Canal is expected to be able to lock through some truly huge ships, even Amercan aircraft carriers and the new generation of super-large tankers and container ships.
Panama_Canal_630
John Wohlstetter recently locked through the old Canal in a much smaller vessel, and has written THIS update on the goings-on in the formerly American Panama Canal Zone.

Speak No Ill of the Dead — Except for Lawrence Walsh

Many of us remember the Iran-Contra scandal during the Reagan administration, and it’s aftermath.  It was ugly, so ugly that I eventually split with a number of my conservative friends over the issue of Lieutenant Colonel Oliver North’s lying to Congress.  True, it was a Congress controlled by Democrats, all working toward the goal of diminishing the Reagan presidency, but I drew the line at lying to Congress.  The system cannot work if a President’s minions are allowed to lie in sworn testimony before Congress, as is being amply re-demonstrated during the Obama presidency.

In fact, from my perspective, the best thing to come out of the whole affair was Fawn Hall’s Playboy magazine centerfold some months later.  Say what you will about Ollie North, but he sure could pick a secretary.

In relation to the Iran-Contra investigation, the largest thorn in President Reagan’s side, and in the side of many within his administration, was the Iran-Contra special prosecutor, Lawrence Walsh, a Democrat.  Walsh’s zeal in the pursuit of illegal activity was exceeded only by his eagerness to besmear President Reagan and his close underlings, and as usual, he had the unflagging cooperation of the print media, particularly the Washington Post and the New York Times.

Lawrence’s name is in the news again because he passed away recently.  Paul Kengor has up a well written piece in The American Spectator about how Walsh was perceived by one of his contemporaries, William P. Clark.  Bill Clark was a long-time friend of Ronald Reagan from his California days, and served pro-bono on the defense team of many accused in the Iran-Contra affair and it’s coverup.  Here is a short excerpt from Kengor’s article:

As Weinberger’s pro bono legal counsel, Clark went to Oklahoma to meet with Walsh.  Speaking as a former judge to judge, Clark tried to persuade the independent counsel that his actions were unjust—or, as Weinberger later put it, “absurd and terribly damaging.”

Clark was shocked by Walsh’s response.  He concluded that Walsh was interested in only one thing: some kind of admission of guilt by Weinberger, or as Weinberger put it: “preferably something—anything—that implicated President Reagan or even Vice President Bush.  If I would give that, the independent counsel’s office could then arrange for no indictment and a light sentence.”

Weinberger and Clark concluded that Walsh’s team wanted Weinberger to be “cooperative” as Walsh and his lawyers pursued Ronald Reagan.

For the full article, click HERE.

USS Gerald Ford (CVN-78) Shaking Out in Newport News

During most of my three-year U.S. Army hitch in the early sixties I was stationed at Fort Story, which is sited on the Virginia coast at Cape Henry, and which marks the southern boundary of the entrance to Chesapeake Bay.  Fort Story was a small base that headquartered the Army’s amphibious operations on the east coast.  From our second-story office window at the base HQ I could look out the window, and occasionally I would grab the office binoculars when I spotted the nuclear powered aircraft carrier Enterprise (CVN-65) passing through the offshore channel.  Although officially classified, the scuttlebutt at the time was that the actual top speed of the Enterprise was about fifty miles per hour, and I remember idly wondering once how far the 95,000-ton carrier would penetrate the shoreline if her skipper were to run her onto the beach at full speed.

The Enterprise is now being decommissioned at the Huntington-Ingalls shipbuilding facility in Newport News, Virginia on the James River, along the northern circumference of the giant Hampton Roads anchorage.  This facility was once known as the Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Company, and was the shipyard for which my uncle was a welder in World War 2.  The Enterprise sits near it’s replacement, the nuclear powered carrier USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN-78).

The Gerald Ford is the first of a new class of American carriers, designed to replace the Nimitz-class.  She is bigger than any previous American aircraft carrier, with a length of 1,106 feet and a displacement of 112,000 tons.  Among the many other improvements to her design, she will be the first U.S. carrier to use the Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System (EMALS), which employs an electrically-powered sled to hurl planes into the air rather than a steam catapult.  The sailors assigned to the Enterprise used to say that her steam catapult could throw a Volkswagen Beatle a mile off her bow.  I don’t know how true that was, but the EMALS rig is supposed to be considerably more powerful than the steam catapults.

For much more information on the Ford, check out THIS article from Popular Mechanics magazine, and THIS entry on WikiPedia.

Two Speakers set for next Morehead City CCTPP Meeting

As can be seen on the Events List (at right in the sidebar), our next regularly scheduled meeting is Tuesday evening at the Golden Corral in Morehead City.  We are scheduled to have the following two speakers:

Willie Montague is a former resident of Morehead City, and was a member of the Crystal Coast Tea Party Patriots back in 2010 or so before moving to Broken Arrow, Oklahoma.  Now visiting relatives in the Carteret County area for a short while, he is an erstwhile candidate for a seat in the Oklahoma House of Representatives, and we hope to hear his experience with that campaign as well as his views on how we can stimulate black conservatives to join our activism, and perhaps our group.

      Randy Feagle

Randy Feagle

Randy Feagle has retired from being a teacher at East Carteret High School, and is now running in the primary as a challenger for the Carteret County District #6 County Commissioner seat currently held by Chairman Jonathan Robinson.

As an additional attraction, the Golden Corral will prepare, as a one-time special concoction not seen on their regular menu, the mouth-watering Kangaroo Pouch Medallions with Dandelion Root Puree, over rice.  Don’t miss it!